media.htm KEY Page Changes 26 Mar. 2007
The MEDIA Page *page created February 1997* LINK TO MOST IMPORTANT REVELATIONS
JOIN the Community On Line and publish
your Statement of Facts (member's
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and
the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (*Link)
and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders.
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and
rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help
establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case
may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when
a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities lbduk.org
Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads UK.org. Do not fail to note the rights
pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely
because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE
& ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the
conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU
We invite you to take part in DATA
collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own
contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all
others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we
point to, assured in law.
IMPORTANT Notification & Announcements
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings
ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief
Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self-
appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who
aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm
(the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists
of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor
excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. They fail to
publish that which they speak of, only in private; they assert and allege that the police
simply fail to act in the criminal activities the 'poor victims' report to the police, and
the 'poor victims even interfere in the work of others who are publishing and stating the
facts and the evidence in support of their complaints, as victims of the rampant fraud and
corruption through the courts / legal system'. [*Link].
KEY To Page & Site
Page DEDICATION (*Link)
NEWS ARTICLES - List
IMAGES reproduced - List
LETTERS TO - List
LETTERS FROM - List
1. Page PERSONS - List
2. VENUES & Events - List
3. Page ISSUES - List
4. Page CHANGES - List
5. Confidential FRAUDS-Page
6. Courts FORGERIES - Page
7. Council FORGERIES -Page
8. Police Use Forgeries -Page
Letters to PRESS - List
1. The Times - Jan.
2. Evening Standard<>
by - List
1. Paul Foot
- 4th April 1993
2. Lord Paul - March 2000
3. part 3
4. Home Office PR Apr. 2002
5. part 5
6. part 6
7. Home Secretary May 2003
8. part 8
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
Times-Plato Not Prozac
PAGE - List
1. Sunday Express - 1993
2. Letter to The Times 1996
3. The Guardian(joke?) 1999
3. Daily Mail - Lord Paul 2000
4. Daily Express Aug. 2003
SITE - List
1. Judge ARRESTED - corrupt
2. Police LIES PROMOTED !
3. Police LIES FOLLOWED Up
4. Police LIES EXPOSED
6. Victim(!) Covers Up CRIMES 7. CRIMES Reported to Gov.
8. Court IGNORES FORGERY
9. Victim(?) - Actors In Court
10. Media Part Of The Scams
11. Council Attempts FRAUD
12. APPEALING Court FRAUD
13. Court IGNORES FRAUD 14. Soc.Sec. IGNORE FRAUD
15 Barristers conduct survey
16. part <>
1. Editor of The
Times - 1996
2. Lord Chancellor Aug. 1998
3. Home Secretary 12 / 1998
4. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
5. Prime Minister - 12 / 1999
6. Frank Field MP - 4 / 2003
7. Haringey Council CROOKS
8. Fraudsters Club Recruit 01
9. Lap-dog - LIPS Fraudster
10. Prime Minister - 2 / 2002
11. The Treasury - 2 / 2002
12. Home Secretary- 2 / 2002
13. Hackney Council CROOKS
14. Editor LEStandard 2/2002
15. ECoHR August 2003
In the NEWS
Minister - 1 / 2002
2. Home Secretary - 4 / 2002
3. Sir Paul Condon - QPM
4. J Stephens Dep. Com 1998
5. Sir John Stevens - QPM
6. Home Secretary - 5 / 2003
Letters FROM - List
1. Gov. Opposition - 1995
2. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
Page ISSUES - List
1.' NO FREE PRESS', a fact
2. 'MEDIA Conspiracy'
3. Journalists LIE / PERVERT
4. Press SUPPRESS Facts
5. Ignorant of the Law ?
6. Page THREE Experts
7. Combating Misinformation
8. Community On Line
9. Mockery of Democracy
10. Media DO NOT CARE
11. SOME Half-truths - List
12. Journalist GAGGED Fact
13. DUTIES OF A JUDGE Law
13. The Bilderberg Group
Page CHANGES - List
1. Links to Your Rights Page
2. Added Letter to Times 96
3. Link to Violation Art
4. Links to Press LIES
5. Added Combat Guidelines
6. Democracy Our Definition
7. Lord Paul -Family Concerns
8. Link D.Telegraph & FRAUD
1. John Swainton - USA
2. Rodney Aitkinson - UK
3. The Bilderberg Group
4. Promoters Of Crimes
5. Paul Johnson - UK
6. Lord Paul - Labour Peer
7. Francis Beckett- - reporter
8. Paul Foot - <>
Page VENUES - List
1. Honest Retirement Speech
2. Daily Mail Article - 1997
The Times on 12 June 1996 The press fully aware of the dictatorial rulings by the non
elected. Judges in an alleged Democracy IMPOSING their arrogant and contemptuous of the
rights of the citizens to DETERMINE through their representatives policy and cost
effective government with security of mind and rights to who qualifies and who should
benefit through tax impositions.
The above in 1996. In 1997 we were raising issue about the Institutionally Organised
rampant fraud in the handling of the Housing Benefit funds, through the Local Authorities
and the local County Courts. In 1998 the Government acted after our submissions to the
Home Secretary. In 2002 we acted again ( *Link). In April 2003 our submissions to Frank Field MP to the point
We pointed to the duties of elected Ministers leading to an explicit response by
the Home Secretary (*Link).
The letter from an Old Age Pensioner suffices. Sheer positive discrimination.
Our concerns have always
been very simple. The judges are retained to administer the law that elected Members of
Parliament enact. Their prime function is to apply the facts proven and established at
court and to apply the relevant law. They are not retained as servants of the public and
the law in order to ignore the evidence or to act in contempt of the law as they do as
absolute Lords in contempt of everything and everybody.
|Daily Mail 1 March 1994
cartoon above on the occasion when the Conservative MP, John Gummer adopted the Roman
Catholic 'faith' after the Synod of the Church of England voted 'to field women priests'.
cartoon below was transmitted to Messrs James Todd of VOMIT repute, Mr. Paul Talbot-
Jenkins & Mr. Maurice Kellett. All 3, recognised subliminal indoctrination
operatives, pumping away their views on the powers that be, while serving other undeclared
interests. All three kept on spreading the gospel for the powers that be.
Image of the cartoon, as submitted to the editor of the 'Daily Mail'.
editor was asked IF he would publish the modified version with the essential changes at
the time. The editor simply stuck his head in the sand as expected of him One need only
consider the words of J Swainton, accessed from here [*L].
The changes more clear than subliminal & to the point as to the forces at work for
They DO NOT CARE
- the proof is in the text
The editor of 'The Times' did not consider the facts and realities
stated in the letter below, suitable information for its readers. The realities pointed
to, did not / do not conform to the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy. As
such the submitted facts were not eligible for publication. The editor's reasons should be
clear to any caring parent who recognises the implications the letter conveys, and
especially so, if such experiences are not alien to them.
The fact is, that children are influenced at such young age, by the ill advised, who
interfere in family and the rights of responsible parents. The policies were and remain
unjustified violations of human-rights because they breach Article 2 of the First Protocol
of the European Convention On human Rights [*Link].
The response below CLEAR
Anyone dreaming of the media lapdogs who serve their masters
ever informing the 'serfs' of the plans of their string pullers need not plans of
nor concerned obviously. The media Intellectual Prostitutes serve other agendas,
as intended for the sons of men. (The arrangements too clear and ignored by the followers
of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of
works ever to be presented to 'humans' : thinkers). Their priorities simply to promote
pre-determined scenarios & scripts in order to mislead, to indoctrinate and subjugate
the naive and gullible to the plans of the criminals who have been in control for far too
long, millennia. (*Link from here to a page where
some truths and historical events are stated in proper context).
|But there exist plenty of other acceptable ideas.
The Headline below says it
all. Can anyone point us to any representations made at the time by ANY OF THE ALLEGEDLY
concerned leaders of any family oriented group of organised victims of the Divorce
Industry and the SS (Social Services) in our allegedly civilised society that is subject
to the whims of alleged servants of the public?
Declared the Prime Minister. We look forward to actions, by New Labour, Government,
establishing the proclamation as genuine from concerned members of his party and any other
political forces in our allegedly civilised democracy.
of the concerns and realities that no one has ever bothered to take on board. Simply
consider the letter to the editor of 'The Times', above, four
years earlier, covering arrogant and blunt interference in the family by persons who
operate within our schools. Education Authorities imposing blindly ill-conceived
policies and creating the society that Lord Paul was/is concerned about. (Mar 2000)
access from here the article text reproduced on the right.
|29 months late, 18th. August 2003.UK serfs
benefited from a gem of an article by Francis Beckett, disseminated by the Daily Express
of the importance of this 'dust in your eyes suckers', article below, read the
disclosures below it and then *Link to the
clarification in another page at this site.
The fact that many an actor, a charlatan, a stooge and
sold souls take targeted victims for a ride in and through the courts may be too much to
swallow. That was precisely what took place in the instance covered / benefiting from the
above type of publicity from the condescending media barons. It was followed by promotion
of the group of the charlatans who engaged in theatrics just like the legal circles do
(*Link).Particulars in due course OR, when requested, by the authorities. OPENLY stating
facts now, that it appears the promise in 1995 is to be attended to by the
government. In the meantime charlatans who were / are members of the LIPS crowd / mob set
about to embarrass and offend us by abusing a copy of the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul
Boateng to Andrew. Blunt abuse of trust and arrogant breach of the terms under which
the copy of the letter was issued to Mr Norman Scarth, other abusers of Andrew's time and
generous nature, simply entertained in their petty and childish ways. TUTORED & GUIDED
CRIMINALS following the ways and teachings from antiquity, as published in an allegedly
holy book, that has been in existence for over 2300 years. [*Link to site].
Copy of the letter below
qualifies the arrangements between the legal circles and 'victims' who, on the one hand
assert many a vile activity by the legal circles, while on the other hand they were / are
engaging in the very activities themselves. The new recruits to the fraudsters club
targeting other victims for introduction to solicitors they already created special bonds
with, just like the one who got away (the protected by the like minded) care of the
suppressed evidence that was prepared by one who was actually following in the foot-steps
of the one he had prepared the file of evidence against. Such persons simply carrying on
as if all they indulge in, is within the law.
Is it a case of simply as the new protected and used for more double frauds on the
state are assured freedoms to indulge in?. Read the letter and recognise the implication. Indirectly
informing the solicitor who acted wrongly: "We do not need your offer.
Our client is to be rewarded for doing things our way. He is to benefit from public funds,
the taxpayers are are going to foot the bill, as usual". FEAST your eyes
on such realities Sir John Stephens QPM. Justify, if you can the convenient
DEFAULTS TO PROSECUTE SUCH BLUNT FRAUDSTERS. They indulge & who milk state funds as
they please. Such arrogant arrangements, between the criminals we point to, and the
police simply protecting them as they have been doing for centuries. We have known of the
protection racket for well over 31 years now and the evidence is published in our pages.
& the usual Positive Discrimination. Our FAX to the editor merited from the usual
contempt for the realities and the blunt RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, otherwise sold to the
naive and gullible as political correctness; they luck the guts or the decency to call it
IMPOSED STATES AS PLANNED AND INTENDED by the criminals behind it all.
Read the text of the image in the right panel & FIND OUT what the media have
been ignoring & suppressing wilfully from their readers. For decades they have all
been promoting the political correctness waffle we wrote of to the editor of 'The Times'.
TRUTHS - List
here, and join Andrew Yiannides at: urrights.ning.com if as a victim you wish to
challenge, EXPOSE abusers of trust & public office or public facilities
Facebookers can connect with the creator of
this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any
pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders
Page Revised: June 20, 2012 : Latest news on DIVORCE INDUSTRY, OFFICIAL statistics
& an important link on use of media
Site reconstruction,ongoing improvements, addition of new pages and links
to and from pages / other web-sites.
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY;
our observations and KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS MADE US ACCESSORIES if we kept
quiet, LIKE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS WHO WORK TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEMES
by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been
wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before
her. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We
are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and
with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes. We refer and point you to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated UK
Unlimited Enterprises, as in other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover,
Navigating the extensive material: access
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are
endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For
further clarification email: webmaster@
This page is dedicated to
the late Paul Foot, the only honest and genuinely concerned journalist we have had the
pleasure to know. For years we admired his work and above all his sincerity and integrity.
Sadly no longer with us after
a life dedicated to serving his fellow humans conscientiously and with vigour. ((*Link to an article that should put to shame many a
journalist and editor who never had the decency to admit and acknowledge that which Mr
Paul Foot clarifies in the article. Mr John Swainton [*Link] spoke
of the very malaise afflicting the silent dummies, when he was moving out of the
firing line,however. Mr Foot, you will note, went one better, because he was not prepared
to abandon his principles, something that even some of the victims (of institutionally
organised fraud and corruption) we have met over the years, most certainly lacked;
presumably they never possessed such attributes, as 'humans', in the first place. *Link to
pages where we deal with and challenge SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES and the convenient defaults
by such dreamers as they prove to have been:/ be (1) Johan
Michael Richard Foenander, (2) Norman Scarth, (3) Veronica Beryl Foden, (4) Paul
Talbot-Jenkins, (5) Barry Worral, (6) Ormila Bhoopaul, (7) G. Ebert,
and others we will be stating facts and releasing material about)).
|The PRESS / MEDIA & THEIR CONTRIBUTION - Link from here to a QUOTE from a challenge to the papers.
" The media play their part, quietly, by
keeping facts from the public they are meant to inform without bias and or through tainted
if not through the blinkered personal views of the editors and the media barons
themselves. Undeclared policies of faceless quangos the media silently support and
promote; presumably because it is in the public interest for the public to be kept in the
dark. So long as selected groups benefit, at the expense of the public at large, the
public must not be informed, for it knows not how to protect itself through the ballot box
in the monocracy of the lowest of the low, supported and or used by the higher in same
manner acting". [Links to: A conspiracy &
AN admittance & a link to the cornerstone and foundations
a new web-site].
often than not the letters editors of the media, are seen to be acting as censors. They
wilfully suppress facts, events and realities referred to them. They act as front line
commanders for the creeping dictatorship in our country, and the rest of planet earth,
which states the founder of human-rights recognised decades ago.With intent they ignore
the rights of citizens who dissent from that which the politicians, and the editors,
agreed to create for and serve to 'the serfs', without disclosing their parts in secret
and undisclosed sessions of which Christ was recorded to have spoken, as reported by the
editors of the New Testament almost 1700 years ago. [*Link
from here to the extract from the gospel according to St
Luke] As masters 'of the serfs' they treat the
citizens and taxpayers with contempt, especially anyone who dissents from that which the
editors set out to impose through tactical, subtle indoctrination of 'the ill-informed
sons of men'. Such states through misinformation, deliberate disinformation and reckless
suppression of the realities. [*Link from
here to a challenge covering / pointing to HISTORICAL FACTS WILFULLY SUPPRESSED, by
the criminals who seek total control of planet earth. *Link also from here to the page where we publish evidence and point to
the root of their plans for the sons of men on planet earth. Persons who ARE
INTERESTED as to how Intellectual Prostitutes misinform the public as John Swainton, an ex
Chief of Staff at 'The New York Times' spoke in the course of his retirement speech, *access
from here the article we point to and recognise why and who behind
the promotion of lies and waffle. Read the rest of the material in this page and
recognise WHY THE ORGANISERS OF THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP -of which Mr Andrew Yiannides
first spoke and wrote in the mid-1970's- DO NOT WISH TO BE RAISED WITH OR POINTED TO THEIR
LAP-DOGS / the sold -to the devil- souls who have been serving & working for their
Masters' plans for mankind, for centuries, as covered and pointed to in our pages].
have plenty of examples and a typical issue was that of the suggestions by the Education
Department, in 1996, 'to contrive and introduce 'a moral code' owing to the fact that
religious education and 'influence in the upbringing of children had declined to non
existent teachings, allegedly because the parents themselves fail in that area'. We
publish copy of a letter which the founder of human-rights -Mr Andrew Yiannides- was
caused to send to the letters editor of 'The Times' at the time and the circumstances when
'The Times' was promoting waffle while ignoring the realities pointed to in the
letter all visitors and concerned parents should access and read. [*Link from here to the letter and
recognise the realities & facts stated, relate to the attempts & how the SCHOOLS
ARE USED, by the Education Authorities, in a typical set-up of a pseudo-democracy]. The content and the circumstances under which Andrew, as a parent,
had been caused to act are as clear as can be. The censor -letters editor, a typical
Intellectual Prostitute- at 'The Times' as an illiterate in / or contemptnor of the law
(and dictator of policy by default) acted his role as a participant to the planning (in
secret venues) of and for the implementation of the dictatorship many are waking up to as
of the developments following the creation of the European Economic Community. The simply
suppressed the facts stated, by failing to publish the letter and thus he wilfully
obstructed the facts from being aired in an allegedly civilised democracy, one that
allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
In our alleged democracy through pre-determined scenarios
the 'subjugation of the serfs', thrives. Such policies have long been established and it
was all planned in secret, centuries ago and re-endorsed in modern times in the middle of
the 20th century, covered below. By their very nature, the 'conspiratorial sessions'
endorsed by and with such others the editors have been associating with for decades. All
in favour of the creation of pseudo-democracies when-ever / where-ever the opportunity
arose or could be created by the very interfering 'institutions'. Read below [*L] of the gratitude expressed by a leading person, a
non-elected self-appointed 'ruler of the serfs' (one of many self-appointed rulers) and do
not fail to access the disputed plans attributed to the very circles -and the followers-
of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything' as presented to mankind some
2300 years ago, by the fraudsters who concocted their evil creation.
the letter [*Link from
here to it] we publish in this page, and
recognise HOW the state breaches and violates human rights through its institutions,
beginning with 'state education centres' where the lessons and guidelines from the vilest
book that ever was created are the foundation stone; upon such teachings the modern moral
code is implemented by the dark powers that have been in control of it all for far too
long. [*Link from here
to the extract a young boy recognised as the most vile of activities, attributed to the
'deity' (the God) created by the creators of the Old Testament in the latter part of the
3rd Century Before the Common Era - in earlier years recorded / referred to as Before
are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time
magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have
respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades". The
words of David Rockefeller who expressed 'his gratitude' as above were published in the
French journal "Minute" in June 1991 [*Link from here to the words attributed
to Jesus Christ by the editors / creators of the New Testament. *Link also from here to an extract from 'The Protocols of the Elders of
Zion', published in Russia in 1902]
The above extract is from Rodney Aitkinson's (British political economist)
work 'Europe's Full Circle'. One of the reviews on the well
researched work, suffices: "The author has done a superb job
in seeking to alert literate people to the colossal and dangerous impudence of corporate
power which has already emasculated elected national legislatures". Fourth World Review.
below, the words of a media insider, dating back to the 1870's. [*Link from here to
the insider's explicit acknowledgement of the realities. *Link also from here to
exchanges with another insider, with 25 years experience in the USA, with the founder of
human-rights when addressing the issue of suppressed historical truths and ongoing
corruption of societies through the media]
propose to publish comments on issues raised with the papers in the
United Kingdom. Fair comment will be made in respect of issues raised by members on the
Register of TAP = The
Its members WILL publish ALL and ANY documented evidence our Law
Enforcement Agencies chose to
ignore and have been ignoring for years. Subjudice my
Lords? Some Court somewhere in the land of the free for all is meant to have dealt
with the issues we SHALL PUBLISH. The rest of the population in the United Kingdom
can then decide if such persons were/are fit to run .... pardon ruin the lives of
others... merely because they benefit from some self-appointed right to act independent
of Parliament's laws*. The laws the rest of society in the United Kingdom is meant to
strictly adhere to. Media barons and editors conveniently forget that, , so our judges remind us.
Those who know of The LAW*, and were appointed to judicial office because of their
knowledge of law, and choose to act INJUDICIOUSLY have none; no defence at all [*Link from here to duties of any
WE NEED ONLY INFORM AND REMIND THE AUTHORITIES that
CRIME IS NOT STATUTE BARRED IN ANY CIVILISED COUNTRY. WE ARE told that
we are a civilised society and the mother of modern Democracy. That WE
ARE leading the world in that area. WE HAVE SUCH LAWS ON OUR STATUTE BOOKS
as to protect one and all from any wrong and defamatory statement that is not founded on
FACT, TRUTH and or documented EVIDENCE. The LAW* supports our cause and guarantees OUR
RIGHTS IN LAW*
The evidence members of TAP are
/ will be publishing through these pages, suffice. Let the world at large be the
OVER TO YOU, YOUR LORDSHIPS, your HONOURS AND
our page three experts. The experts who promote and use EVES as in the
Old Testament qualified and clarified. We point to that fact that the Old Testament
is common to ALL THREE basic religions the vast majority of the population in the United
Kingdom, was born into. It is immaterial if they follow their predecessors' orientations
and MORALS* as opposed to the secularism instilled in the citizens through the
media and 'the self appointed knowledge classes', as Frank
Schaeffer refers to 'specialists' who think they know best, in his work, "Dancing Alone".
The knowledge classes, like our judges, doing their best to create
a society of lawlessness and free individuals who are encouraged TO INDULGE AT
THE EXPENSE OF THE MAJORITY, just as the legal/judicial/police/Mafia were/have been
allowed to lead us into for..... HOW LONG?
NOTE our challenge to the editor of the Daily Mail. On the
very day Paul Johnson was declaring "Corrupt Britain"*
and the editor was proclaiming: "Time For Ministers To Tell The Truth...
in the editorial column. OUR CHALLENGE, clear. HOW ABOUT THE
EDITORS making sure that the public is TOLD the truth and given the chance to make up its
"Treat not the public as morons, please, because
THE INTERNET IS HERE TO STAY; to
protect the citizens from the licensed criminals who have been feasting upon the 'serfs'
for centuries. They have been doing so, because the MEDIA, the so called guardians of
society, are run by sold souls who serve the abusers of office, the corrupters, the
corrupt, and the corrupted". [*Access below: Chief of Staff confirms the
rampant Press LIES. *Access also the letter
challenging an editor to come clean OR go learn and investigate TRUE HISTORICAL EVENTS.
*Do access also email exchanges between Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of
human-rights, and an insider with 25 years experience in the USA]
below, spells things out, especially the fact that the Prime Minister, acted in accordance
with the evidence submitted to him by the creator of these pages and web-site. We need
only add that it was not a case of simply the media barons, and the Intellectual
Prostitutes retained and maintained by them, who elected to ignore the developments and
suppress the realities. All alleged victim challengers who contacted us treated the
developments as non-events just like the media. [*Link from here to the page
where we released email exchanges with an alleged victim-challenger but recognised
convert-to & lover-user of the facilities in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers
and corruption of conditioned morons though abuse of the courts facilities, working in
tandem with the legal circles and NOTE THE CHALLENGES to the craft-y one, an alleged
Copy of the letter on the right was submitted to the editors
||The Daily Telegraph
||The Daily Mail
||The Daily Express
|The Daily Mirror
||The London Evening
the letter were also delivered to the House of Commons for reference to by and the
attention of the Home Affairs Spokes Persons / Shadow Cabinets of the Conservatives &
Many the copies of
submissions, such as the letter to the Home Secretary the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard in 1993,
the letter to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw in December 1998 when Home Secretary, the letters to
the Rt. Hon. Frank Field in 1997, the letter to the DSS Fraud Department in May
1998, the submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and to the Home Secretary in
February / March 2002, the explicit letter to the Rt. Hon Frank Field MP in April 2003 and
We need to add that all
persons who contacted us over the years received copies of the letters & or were
pointed to the pages where we published copies of the letters. Copies of the letters and
additional material which we posted to the DSS Fraud Department were also submitted to the
publicist Max Clifford, whose services secured the interest of the media in the matter of
the multiple litter a human was to give birth to after interference with / manipulation of
nature by the medical professions. Also of great interest too, the media Barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, determined that Mr & Mrs Average should regale
at the fact that a 14 year old schoolgirl was impregnated by a 12 years old boy and the
girls parents declared that they would be all too happy to raise their grandchild while
their daughter was to carry on with her education, the education system that taught her
how as an animal she could reproduce the species, the species with no moral values, ethics
or citizenship responsibilities, as organised by the abductors of Democracy and Justice.
Letter to the Prime Minister in December 1999
Chris Jones of C4 was but one of many within the media who
received copy of the above letter and many the exchanges in the course of telephone calls.
RESPONSE ; NONE. Of no interest and no
concern whatsoever in ORGANISED CRIME
hasten to point out that the media Barons / Editors and the Intellectual Prostitutes they
control and manipulate COULD NOT CARE LESS ABOUT THE STATE OF ARROGANT & BLUNT FRAUD
ON THE TAXPAYERS. In the meantime busy informing us where a married man used to go for
something he was not able to benefit from, at home.
WITH THE ABOVE REALITIES in mind,
can anyone ignore the contributions of all ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS TOWARDS THE
MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS? Can anyone ignore the RECKLESS DEFAULTS &
OMISSIONS by persons we name and expose as converts-to and lovers of the system of
operations? We refer all, yet again, to the realities we pointed one and all umpteen
times, as covered in the page /confraud.htm & WE
POINT ALL to the House of Lords Precedent case, some details of which we released in March
2008 in the page /4suckers.htm
COMBATING DISINFORMATION &
DEFAULTS BY THE MEDIA
VICTIMS COULD / SHOULD ACT as the law provides
you have complained and gone to the media. You have been ignored or the local press
published a half baked potato thus appearing concerned about the serious issues you
reported. We keep in mind the complete lack of interest, by the media barons and their
stooges, in the matter of the rampant fraud and corruption from within Local
Government and Authorities as endorsed, aided and abetted crimes by the police and the
local courts. We cover such realities and facts in our pages, as wide awake and as law
abiding citizens. We act so because we respect the rights of the tax payers, who should
get to know of the truth; how alleged public(!) servants(?) indulge and freely serve other
agendas, thereby generating and instigating rampant criminal activities, at the public's
expense. [*Link from here
to a challenge to the Crown Prosecution Service covering in a nutshell ALL THAT
ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS ENGAGE IN, AS CREATORS OF THE SOCIETY OF THE TEACHINGS MOST
FOLLOW, FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER PRESENTED TO THE SONS OF MEN).
||You believe, in fact you know, that you are not the only victim of
malpractice and or downright fraud by public servants who abused/abuse public office and
misled you. They mislead 'their masters, the citizens' and simply TREAT THEM AS SERFS of
the Middle Ages.
a daily paper and you know that much is to be desired because of the
lack of frank and honest information, making mockery of all assertions about democracy by
the hypocrites who serve you with such crap.
do not buy a newspaper for a day or two. Instead use the coppers / pennies / cents / Euros
it would cost you to buy the paper and make copies of a statement of the issues and facts
(which you can prove) that you complained about and reported to the sold souls who are
operating under the guise of 'free press / media' in our pseudo-democracies.
the cheap cost of local copy-services you end up with at least half a dozen of copies of
an A4 sheet where you are stating the facts and realities. Include your name and telephone
/ contact address.
the offices/place where the offensive activities and or the newspaper / courts buildings
that ignored the matters you are raising in your statement of facts - copies.
COPIES to persons who acknowledge to you similar experiences. AND ask the recipients to
also not buy a newspaper for a day or two and make more copies which they should then pass
on to other concerned citizens from within your neighbourhood. At the same time they act
similarly in stating their own experiences.
should only take a few hours of each person's time to act as we invite you, but when a
number of recipients do act as we suggest the number will multiply and within your area
you should be able to get a group together ready, willing and able to take additional
initiatives that the offending public servants / yes-men lap-dogs will be having to deal
with as public servants and not as sold souls
YOU HAVE enough supporters / persons sharing your concerns and anxieties about mankind you
could set up your own web-site. There you can publish the vile activities and the facts
that establish and prove criminal activities that are ignored and endorsed by those who
allegedly are retained to serve the citizens and the law. Once published, spread the news
through your email contacts and in news-group postings, ALL CAN THEN ACCESS THE FACTS AND
THE EVIDENCE and you can point them to the applicable law that was / is breached by
alleged public(!) servants*(?) that we point to on our pages.
consider the words of John Swainton, who served as Chief of Staff with
the 'New York Times' in the 1860's / 1870's. The quote, from his retirement speech to his
staff is from an article by Dana Baker on "Media Suppression" in Profile
is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There's not one of you who
would dare to write his honest opinion. The business of a journalist is to destroy truth,
to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell
himself, his country and his race for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich
men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents,
our possibilities and our lives are the property of these men. we are intellectual
prostitutes". [*Link from here to the root
of it all and read of the plans for 'the serfs', for the sons of men on planet earth]
EXPRESS April 1993
|IT'S YOU WHO
LOSE OUT WHEN
By Paul Foot
`The freedom that means
standing up to the bully'.
[Access the plans
behind it all]
OPINION polls about the professions, we journalists always do very badly.
We fight it out with estate agents for the wooden spoon.
I think, on the whole, we deserve our lowly
position, though why doctors and accountants always do so well I've never understood.
Perhaps it's because doctors and
accountants have a close personal relationship with their clients, while journalists
usually stumble into people's lives at time of stress or disaster.
Last week I felt forced to walk out of a
journalist's job which put me in rare contact with my readers.
For the last 13 1/2 years I have written a
page in the Daily Mirror. My sources and inspiration were the Mirror readers.
A ceaseless flow of letters and calls came
to me from people I'd never met, people who read and enjoyed the Daily Mirror but felt it
was more than just a good read. They felt, rightly, that the Mirror had a reputation for
springing to the support of its readers when they were in trouble.
I felt like a court of last resort. The
people who wrote to me had, usually, already been to see their solicitor or their MP.
They knew I was not qualified to help them.
They knew that my only power was to write, and to keep writing on their behalf. And they
reckoned, rightly, that the power was often enough to correct a wrong which had run out of
remedies in the courts or in Parliament or anywhere else.
A lot of these letters came from prisons,
from people who said they'd been wrongly convicted. When I started writing my column - in
1979 - it seemed to most people impossible that anyone could be wrongfully convicted of a
serious crime. As I looked into the cases, I was shocked at how many wrong convictions
they proved. I raised case after case, often without success.
When Kevin Sarbutts came into my office to
tell me he had lied when he told a court he had seen Aban Turner stab a man to death at
the Notting Hill Carnival, I believed him at once, and wrote about it; then wrote about it
Before long Aban Turner who'd been
convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on Sarbutts's false evidence, walked free.
The Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, the
Swansea Two, the Cardiff Three were all released after strong journalists' campaigns.
Campaigns like this get high praise when
they are successful. While they are going on, they are always unpopular.
WHEN a hospital worker wrote to me in 1983
complaining about a sleeping pill called Halcion, I wrote again and again about its
dangerous side effects. Drug companies and doctors united against me, warning me to clear
off their patch. Then suddenly last year, eight years after my campaign, Halcion was
banned. To campaign like this we need the backing of our editors, and our own space to
forge a trust with our readers. For 13 years at the Mirror I was lucky to have both.
I noticed as the years went on that the
letters and calls changed in tone. The formalities with which people normally contact
Mr Foot" became "Dear Paul." It was as though people were reading what I
wrote, growing used to it, and feeling free to share their lives and their problems with
It is crucial that journalists should have
the space and the freedom to campaign for their readers as I was able to do.
If the freedom of the Press means anything,
it must mean the freedom to write against the stream, to challenge orthodoxies and power
complexes, to use the strength of big newspaper combines to stand up for the underdog
against the bully.
But what if the newspaper itself is run by
bullies? What if the atmosphere inside a newspaper office reflects the problems which the
campaigning journalist is trying to solve?
I've been grappling with that contradiction
since 1984 when Robed Maxwell bought the Daily Mirror. He was a bully to beat all bullies.
He hated opposition from anyone, and certainly didn't tolerate any from his own employees.
Campaigning and exposition in a Maxwell
paper wasn't easy. Again and again people
would say: "How can you complain about
this boss when Maxwell is worse?
I gritted my teeth and stuck to my column,
knowing that my editors protected me against Maxwell and that, all Mirror journalists were
members of a trade union with which Maxwell signed and honoured agreements.
Since last October, since our new
management took over at the Daily Mirror and sacked the editor, these protections have
vanished. The editor and the management act together.
The journalists' union has been
Many of the letters I've had in the last
six months have complained about "macho management" - indiscriminate sackings
I wrote about these in my column, but
increasingly it seemed absurd to expose macho management elsewhere without mentioning what
was going on in the building I worked in.
I decided to write about that as well. I
wrote a whole column about the Mirror management. For the first time in 13 1/2 years the
column was not printed.
When I printed it myself and handed it out
to the public, the editor sent faxes to all other editors suggesting I was off my rocker.
Our unjust and divided society desperately
needs campaigning journalists.
If we are, as some suggest, a dying breed,
then a hunk of free speech and democracy is dying with us.
But campaigning journalists cannot survive
if the newspapers which employ them are run by petty dictatorships of the type those
newspapers should set out to expose.
© Express Newspapers Ltd.
We can only point out
that while journalists ARE GAGGED by their controllers / employers ALL OF THE ALLEGED
VICTIM - CHALLENGERS WE ARE EXPOSING as lover-converts to the system of operations and the
facilities in place for RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS (through abuse of the courts
facilities) EACH & EVERYONE HAD THE LUXURY OF FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Their failures to
state the facts, REPORT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN that which the media barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes suppress, places them in the unenviable position of MAINTENANCE
ENGINEERS, & USERS / PROMOTERS OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR THE CORRUPTION OF
MORONS OF THEIR MENTALITY & ATTITUDE TO LAW. [*Link to the facility in place]
In the Daily Mail, an all
important article relevant to FAMILY in March 2000
As Jack Straw praises
traditional Asian family values.....
We British Asians look with sorrow
at the spread of divorce, children born outside marriage
and what might be taught about homosexuality.
I wish the party I love would do more
to support the family.
by Lord Paul
Leading Labour Peer
JACK STRAW'S wise
words about the strength and resilience of the traditional Asian family will be welcomed
by the millions of British subjects whose origins lie in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
It is one more sign that this Government genuinely believes that we are a
legitimate part of this country and our values and attitudes are an asset, not a source of
Those of us who are ourselves immigrants - I am one, I came here in 1966 -
know how right the Home Secretary is to emphasise the importance of marriage to the
stability and progress of the Asian community.
We desperately needed the backing of our wives and children in those early
days. Quite simply, we would not have survived and prospered without the support provided
by marriage - proper, traditional marriage.
And, without the discipline imposed on us by the knowledge that we had a
continuing legal and religious obligation (as well as an obligation founded on love) to
support our wives and children, we would certainly not have found the strength and the
stability needed to build up mighty businesses and to plan for our domestic futures in our
We would not have settled as well as we have, we would not have contributed
as much and, I suspect, we would not have been as readily accepted.
That is why I am convinced that the Government must do
much more to recognise and support the institution of marriage and pay less attention to
those trendy liberals who argue that all 'relationships' are much of a mushiness.
They are not. Marriage is a unique public declaration of commitment and I
hope that the Government I support will do more to emphasise that uniqueness.
In my case, I came to this country in 1966 to be with my beloved daughter,
Ambika, who was being treated for leukaemia here. When she died, my wife and I were so
heartbroken that we determined to stay on to be near her. That is why I founded my
business here instead of going back home to join the family firm.
Thirty years later I was in a position to hand over what had become a
commercial giant to the day-to-day control of my three sons Ambar, Akash and Angad. But
they insisted that I stay on as chairman and they give me due deference.
I know they do not always think I am right, but they accept that I am a
source of experience and wisdom and have been around for a long time. Above all, they know
that I try to think like the head of an extended family with responsibilities which extend
down the generations.
I am proud, not embarrassed, to say that mine is a family business which I
hope will, in time, be handed on to my grandchildren. I believe that extended families can
run and build businesses with long-term views and a clear sense of responsibility.
In the societies from which we came, it was generally accepted that marriage
(not liaisons, continuing or casual) was the foundation stone on which our communities,
our nations and our prosperity were built. Marriage was, quite simply, the bedrock of
If marriage and the family came under strain then so did society.
I am convinced that to be successful in business you need to be happy in your
That is why I, like many Asians, look with sorrow
at the steady erosion of marriage in this, our adopted country and we hope that the
Government will do more to reverse the trend.
We despair at the spread of divorce and the number of children born outside
marriage. We are not happy with casual promiscuity and we worry what our children might be
taught about homosexuality.
We are particularly concerned that some Asian youngsters are accepting the
casual, anything-goes approach to sex, which they see all around them. Of course I accept
the point that the Home Secretary made yesterday: 'Single parent families and parents who
have chosen to live together without marrying can in the right circumstances do well for
their children.' Who ever thought otherwise?
Mr Straw himself stressed the fundamental point that marriage had 'a better
chance of offering children a stable environment in which to grow up'.
We Asians are brought up knowing that. Our instinctive feeling for marriage
is strengthened by academic research, which shows that children desperately need stability
and continuity - and that these values are most likely to be found in God-fearing families
built around proper marriages.
For almost five years now I have sat in the House of Lords,
where I am proud to take the Labour Whip and to support an administration, which I believe
is doing much good.
I have had the opportunity to talk with Tony Blair and most of the leading
figures in his cabinet. I am convinced that their belief in the importance of marriage and
of family values is sincere.
But I wish and hope that this support becomes more visible.
Take the whole, unnecessary row over the repeal of Section 28.
When the issue came before the Lords some weeks ago I decided to abstain.
Last night, after listening to the discussion and the compromise the Government has made,
and realising that there are a number of people who believe less in the institution of
marriage than I do, I voted with the Government.
The other big consideration for me was that the Lords should not defy the
will of the Commons. But I remain convinced that its phraseology blurs the distinction
between marriage and cohabitation.
As for the abolition of the Married Couples Allowance in our tax and benefit
system, it has given a negative message and I wish it could be reversed.
Why does marriage not bring with it fiscal rewards - as it does in France and
It is easy to utter kind and no doubt sincere - words about the worthiness of
marriage and family values.
But I wish the Government I support would do more to support the family.
© Daily Mail - UK Friday,
March 24, 2000
Most interesting article by Francis Beckett, in August 2003. Nothing but
promotions of that which the abductors and rapists of Justice & Democracy have been
busy creating for centuries. Visitors, readers will be invited to access material and
pages when released for general access.*Link from here to a
report from an awakened victim of the system of operations, released in May 2009.
the Daily Express about the performance of boys at school
- Simply consider
- We did invite the author and the
editor of the Daily Express to contact us.
- We wished and still aim to point
them both to the elements that they appear to be oblivious to.
- As well tutored or manipulated
marionettes, they are not likely to consider our views.
- We do not expect any responses
from the mentally blind, deaf and dumb; they simply serve their masters as faithful
We do look to more victims, who know of
the realities, to join the growing numbers of the pro-active who use their rights, assured
in law, and we expect of them to state/report in the public domain the facts of life
in all allegedly civilised states. [*Link
from here to an assured (?) right].
and researchers are requested to access the article we reproduce below, in HTML for links
to & from. All can learn a thing or two from hypocrites & Intellectual Prostitutes
who are serving the plans of the evil ones, for the 'SONS OF MEN', as clarified in very
explicit material we publish in our pages (*F1).
Monday 18 August, 2003
By FRANCIS BECKETT
Why Boys Are Second Best In The Classroom
NEXT week's GCSE
results will confirm what we already know. Our daughters are performing better in the
classroom than our sons, the gap gets wider every year and the worst performing boys come
from the poorest homes. We know it is partly because there is a culture among teenage boys
that looks down on doing well in lessons - but that has always been there.
When I was at school the "swot" always top in everything, always
with his hand waving frantically in the air when a teacher asked a question, was a
despised figure. Heaven help him if he met the first rugby XV in a dark alley.
So, why is the gap getting bigger? Schools minister David Miliband thinks it
is because boys' schools need a greater culture of achievement and firmer discipline and
no doubt he is right, as far as it goes.
He is on shakier ground when he suggests that more course work and fewer
examinations favour girls. He says this "feminises" the (GCSE and A-level
systems but there is nothing particularly "feminine" about course work or
"masculine" about examinations.
And there is no reason to believe that if you abandoned course work and
relied solely on examinations, boys would start to narrow the gap. You have to look deeper
than that to understand why our education system is letting down boys and why boys from
the poorest families are let down worst.
First, there are far fewer male teachers than there used to be. Children are
likely to be taught mostly by women. In fact, there are many primary schools attended by
both sexes, which have only women teaching. So boys subconsciously start to think that
schoolwork is something that girls do.
Men are deserting the teaching profession, partly because it pays badly.
Despite the recent increase, teachers are still not paid enough to keep their families in
comfort, especially those who work in cities. The earnings of the wife who teaches are
still often seen as the "second income" - husbands get a proper job and keep the
family and wives teach to pay for extras.
And the growing culture of complaint and litigation means that all teachers,
but especially men, have to be very careful how they behave towards children, lest they
Many male teachers now say that they never talk to a girl pupil alone, only
with a woman teacher present as a witness. Teaching under those conditions is stressful
Second, there is the growing strength and dominance of the "lad
culture". This is reinforced by the school of feminists that believes that the best
way to get equal treatment for girls is to run down boys.
There are still some women teachers who try to increase the self worth of the
girls in their care by undermining that of the boys. Feminist writer Angela Phillips's
latest book is called, ominously, "The Trouble With Boys".
"There's a general sense," writes education lecturer Dr. Anne Gray
"in which boys are seen to be missing out and that men are becoming redundant.
Traditional forms of male employment are on the decline.
"And the areas of employment are demanding skills that girls have always
been good at - like good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance
several tasks at once."
Now, some girls have good communication skills, social skills and the ability
to balance tasks, and some do not. Some boys have them, and some do not. If we tell boys
that these things are essentially female characteristics we have only ourselves to blame
if they decide that their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant. But why is
it that the poorer the family, the wider the gap? Working-class boys are falling behind
all other pupils at an alarming rate.
They are not doing as well as their brains and skills and talents suggest
they should do," says Mr Miliband.
This is a direct result of government policies. Poor children do not normally
get to grammar schools, which select the most academically able pupils at the age of 11.
In comprehensives, one in five of the children are poor enough to get free school meals.
In grammar schools, it is about one in 37. So children from poor families tend to assume
that they will go to the non-selective - and therefore the less academic - schools.
And as the Government increases the number of schools which are allowed to
select some or all of their pupils it will further reduce the expectations of the poor.
CHILDREN do well if they can see some hope. If, when they look around them,
they find that people from their part of town go to the less desirable schools, as the
poor find, then hope is undermined.
If, when they listen to their elders, they learn that their sex is inherently
stupider than the opposite sex, their hope is undermined even further. It is no wonder
that working-class boys see little point in studying.
`We've only ourselves to
blame if boys decide their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant'
© Express Newspapers - 18th August 2003
May 2003, below clearly
stated and pointed to HISTORICAL FACTS & REALITIES. Typical of editors, the London
Evening Standard's, ignored it all. [*Access ]
in HTML for links to and from, the text of the
FAX-letter - submissions and invitation to the editor of the London Evening Standard. As a
typical 'puppet & sold to the devil soul' Ms Veronica Wadley could not be bothered
with the truths she was pointed to. Cooking the books - like tax avoidance accountants -
is part of her retainer. She simply acted / behaved exactly as John Swainton spoke of
when he was moving out of the firing line (*Link). Positive discrimination IS
part of the service on offer to the puppeteers and pay-cheque barons, in
V. Wadley – London Evening Standard
7937 - 2648
Yiannides – Human-Rights Org. London
16/03/05 Created: 10 May 2003
Promotions For Undisclosed Aims
||THREE – with
Indoctrination / Suppression of truths
||¨ FOR REVIEW
||¨ PLEASE ACT
||¨ Please COMMENT
||¨ Please REPLY
||¨ Please RECYCLE
Dear Ms Wadley
Interesting the article by David Cohen and the issue of concerns and
fears by ordinary folk up and down the country.
Through the article Mr Cohen, rightly set out to use the usual
promotions that rest and are founded on ‘the holocaust as sold to the uninformed’, by
way of ‘a warning to the citizens, of ‘the consequences’ to the path they are
taking. In the meantime politicians and the media, collectively, impose on the citizens
undeclared plans for them.
Can you please inform your readers, as to or if ever the LES addressed
the issue of the original holocaust? I refer to the ethnic/religious cleansing, by the
Turks, of the Armenian Christians and the Greek Christians. Historical facts and realities
cannot be suppressed, by design, merely because it suits the plans of individuals and or
of any group of organised ‘abusers of media facilities’ in our times. In reference to
the original holocaust (from the Greek word ‘olocaftoma’, meaning to burn the lot)
Hitler was reported and recorded to have retorted: "Who remembers/speaks of the
What of the following recorded facts and realities? The papal
legate in Croatia, Mgr. Marcone, openly blessing the Ustasha and publicly giving the
fascist salute! His Eminence Archbishop Stepinac, head of the Catholic Hierarchy in
Croatia informing the Holy Father that 240,000 Orthodox Serbs had been converted to the
Church of God"! . What of the fact that the present Holy
Father in 1998 made Archbishop Stepinac of Croatia, where 700,000 Orthodox Serbians
were gassed along with 250,000 plus Jews and Romany, A SAINT.
I am sure that you, personally, and the LES, will publish this letter
because of the historical facts that I point you to. If anything you, and the LES, must be
seen to be unbiased and informative; after all that is the real purpose of any newspaper
in any ‘true democratic’ state.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS
from here to image of the transmitted FAX, in left panel]
from here to the root of it all as planned by impostors
The convenient defaults by the editor to apply herself to
the issues she was pointed, fade into insignificance when one considers the
ever-present promotions and the only logical conclusion one can derive from the reference
to the church presumably created by God himself. [In late 2006 we were informed that Turkey's relationship with
the USA is likely to be adversely affected, should the USA go on record as recognising
'the cleansing of Armenian Christians of Asia Minor' >>> And in 2008 the European
Union is caused by the French to consider the suppressed realities and historical events
we pointed to the editor of the London Evening Standard].
The Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony
Blair was reported, on 29th September 1998, to have stated that he
could / can save the family.... Years on and no signs of calling the legal circles to
book, despite an alleged investigation by the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan
police. He had been instructed, in July of the same, year to investigate the
untouchables..... corrupt judges, solicitors, police officers... [*Link from here to the press
release in July 1998. *Readers & researchers should Link to a brief statement,
that never was intended for the taxpayers, in respect of the Hudson family case; all
should consider accessing other material we point to from there].
- In March 2000 the same
newspaper presented its readers with the views and concerns of Lord Paul. [*Link from here to the
- Most clearly stated his Lordship's views on family matters. No decent human
could ever overlook or ignore the fundamental principles and the reasons why citizens
engage in the creation of families, especially the purpose for such social units in
'civilised societies' that evolved of similar foundations from primitive societies. [*Link from here
to awakenings in persons who recognised the fact that women / Eves were/are being used by
the creators of pseudo-civilised societies in accordance with the New World Order Code of
Morals & Ethics]
- Readers, researchers and
victims of the divorce industry should acquaint themselves with the facts and the
realities in the case we publish, and expose HOW three generations ended up in litigation
and wars within the courts after a caring daughter retained solicitors to... [*Link from here
to the page and prepare for more revelations and evidence attached to the parts and the
activities of the fraudsters-club-recruit]
|IMPRESSIVE REVELATIONS & THE VICTIMS ACCOSTED &
COERCED TO JOIN THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB WE POINT TO IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE WHERE WE EXPOSE THE
MODUS OPERANDI SIMPLY MULTIPLY. [*Link from here to the exclusive
One of the rare media gems, a half baked potato the
public was offered while hundreds, if not thousands of cases up and down the country were
being reported to the press and to the media, by the victims. The victims invariably men
and, on the agenda, the plans of the LIPS crowd / mob to proceed as Andrew was
invited to take part in BUT TURNED DOWN, on many instances. Among them the only
sincere (?) person Mr G. H Scriven. He was forced into a compromising situation and had no
option but to go along the path that others were treading. He had, after all, accepted to
act as President of the LIPS crowd mob. One of the others was the 'victim' Johan M. R.
Foenander, who was introduced to us after he had already negotiated a settlement to be met
by the tax payers under the table, as a letter from solicitors who were representing him
at the time of the introduction, establishes. A few others, introduced to human-rights, by
the LIPS crowd / mob acting also as endorsers of the double fraud without flinching an eye
lid. Many looking forward to being party to more of the same, as alleged legal gurus
helping others down the only path they had endorsed. [*Link from here to the letter]
|The Mail on Sunday
|The headline declaration for the article the 'Mail on Sunday'
disseminated in 1999 suffices. We shall release evidence establishing beyond and doubt the
element of ORGANISED ASSAULT ON FAMILIES in the United Kingdom, one of the many
pseudodemocracies and specifically targeted Christian states, all care of plans that have
been on the drawing boards of the criminals who set out to take control of all and
everything on planet earth ('mother gaia') centuries millennia ago.
|More acknowledgements and developments in the pipeline,
10 years AFTER the propositions from one who recognised and knew of it all. The realities
one reads of below, submitted to many a 'fraudster club recruit' and recognised lovers, of
the system of operations : * of the rampant FRAUD THROUGH the courts leading to the
corruption of morons of their amoral fibre* [*L].
enquiry of the proponents: "It
is a well known factor that the controllers / owners of THE INFORMATION MEDIA are
suppressing the truth and the realities, from the citizens because of the personal
interests and the aims / plans of the controllers of the media and others with whom they
have set agendas and goals for the planet"*. [*L]
And the Response: "Yes
I know!!! It is deplorable! The Internet is changing this!!! They can't stop us now!!. I
am being optimistic. You must be aware of this.... many interesting articles and
ELSEWHERE on the very issues: "Since this is a virtual business and there will
be servers ALL OVER THE WORLD, I think it will be hard to be 'fully corrupted' .... you
will be sure to find many like minded people to work with you..... just for the record, I
have spent 25 years working in the US.... talk about corruption!!! I will not even begin
to tell you how excited I am to be part of building the....".
The email exchanges were forwarded to a number of recognised hypocrites who simply ignored
such developments. They just carried on 'serving their personal interests and their
undeclared partnerships / co-operation with the creators of the New World Order Code of
Ethics & Morals, as adopters of it.*Link [*L]
to more facts
The exchanges will be released in due course. Priority is to
challenge / expose the maintenance engineers and front line soldiers, the lovers of the
system we name and expose. They have been serving the system as committed front line
soldiers fraudsters club recruits.
Date submitted to many an allegedly concerned challenger, 10th
May 2003. Mr. P Talbot Jenkins exhibited the usual contempt which persons who serve other
agendas engage in. [*Link from here to email exchanges
with him & work things out or seek further information]
|The above with our compliments to the managers and controllers of
the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS) and their gurus. ALL OF WHOM promoting plenty of
fraudulent misrepresentations, taking part in theatrical productions intended to impress
the victims they are pointed to & SUCK INTO THEIR WORLD OF FRAUD APLENTY. The
corruption of 'the serfs' they use for the intended REWARDS under the table as created and
imposed by the organisers and managers of it all.
In March 2007 the
National Audit Office reported :
LAWYERS ARE STEERING DIVORCING COUPLES.....
We recommend researchers and
victims to first read the newspaper article, which we reproduced from the Daily Mail of
2nd March 2007, in its entirety. Anyone genuinely concerned about the practices, referred
and pointed to by the Commons Public Accounts Committee, should then re-read the article
and access each link-to page / material from each point where the links are placed. The
reader shall then benefit from a BETTER GRASP OF THE PRACTICES and the arrogant FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, AS USED BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES WITH ARROGANT
from here to a page where we cover some of the practices in the
courts and the divorce industry; recognise the evil forces at work. *Do read the
appeal published [*L] in the page
and recognise why a fraudsters' club recruit shoved the appeal in the closet of the family
he had joined BEFORE he came along to promote all manner of alleged concerns, as a typical
lover of it all, which love his activities and his conscious parts in the constructive
frauds established beyond any doubt. Recognise how organised the fraud through the
courts has been and who are responsible for sustaining it through misrepresentations and
false assertions. Only after using the links pointed to from the parts where links are
incorporated (for additional material to access) informed opinions and views can be
By Matthew Hickley - Home Affairs
LAWYERS are cynically steering
divorcing couples away from cheap mediation sessions and into costly court battles to
boost their fees, an official report claims.[*Link from here to an extract from a researcher's published work]
With four out of five divorces ending up before a judge, millions of
pounds of taxpayers money is being squandered on legal aid, according to the National
Audit Office. [No mention by the author of the
article about the fact that Legal Aid is just A LICENSE TO CHARGE & CONVERT TARGETED
ASSETS, as below covered, to legal costs through the stated facts & activities [*L] covered by the article]
Many cases could have been settled far quicker and with less animosity
if lawyers had not kept their clients in the dark about the mediation option, it is said.
The spending watchdog calls for an urgent investigation into solicitors
who fail to keep enough cases out of the courtroom, and says they should be stripped of
legal aid contracts unless they have a convincing excuse.[*Link from here to CHALLENGES when solicitors
Critics last night accused 'fatcat lawyers' of exploiting emotionally stressed divorce
clients to turn a fast buck and pointed out they are under a legal obligation to
The Chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, Edward Leigh,
urged a crackdown on lawyers who are 'happy to jump straight into court room, leaving the
taxpayer to pick up the bill".
Leading solicitors acknowledge that sharp practices existed, but claimed
only a small minority of lawyers were at fault and insisted mediation would be futile in
many of the 150,000 divorces in England and Wales each year.
Last year divorce cases swallowed some £328million of the legal aid
budget, up from £320million the previous year.
Whenever legal aid is involved solicitors are obliged to offer clients
the option of mediation. But the NAO report found a third of such divorces had never heard
Of those, almost half said they would have given the process a go had
they known. Their cases alone would have saved the taxpayer £10million.
The sessions offer divorcing couples a chance to sit down with a trained
mediator to hammer out a financial deal and agreement on child custody. Some 60 per cent
of attempts are successful.
The couple still each receive legal advise from a solicitor but, without
court hearings, the process is far quicker and cheaper - taking an average
three-and-a-half months to settle and costing £752 in legal aid, compared with 14 months
and £1,682 for court cases.
And although mediation is often still stressful, research since the
1980s, when it first became widespread, shows agreements are less acrimonious and work
better in the long term, particularly for children. In parts of the U.S. mediation is
compulsory for all divorces, while in Sweden 90 per cent of cases are resolved outside
The NAO report says far more British divorce cases should be settled
Excluding divorces involving violence or abuse, where mediation is
usually impossible, the watchdog found that out of 150,000 legal aid cases over an 18
month period only 30,000 - one in five - attempted mediation, while the majority went
straight to court. [*Link to Footnote]
The report highlighted the 'financial disincentive to solicitors of
advising people about mediation', adding : 'If a case is settled out of court, this will
result in a loss of potential fees for them.'
The report follows years of accusations that lawyers deliberately spin-out
divorce cases and fuel disagreements to maximise their fees.
One case involving a Derby businessman and his wife
- dubbed the War of the Roses after a Hollywood movie - finally settled in the High Court
in 2004 after swallowing up £570,000 in legal bills, more than half the couple's
assets. A judge described the fees as 'shockingly disproportionate'.
Martin Mears, former president of the Law Society and now a practising
solicitor, said: 'Of course there's a minority of old fashioned solicitors who make their
money from fomenting disagreements.
'Everyone knows there are some, but I think it's a very small number.
It's hard to identify such cases.'
Resolution, formerly the Solicitors Family Law Association, rejected the
NAO's accusations, claiming its 5,000 members did everything they could to encourage
mediation and other 'alternative ways of resolving disputes' whenever possible.
2nd March 2007
© Associated Newspapers Limited - London UK
|Below a simple statement in respect of the Hudson
family divorce. The case WAS TO HAVE BEEN REPORTED & COVERED BY US after Mr Andrew
Yiannides met with 'the victim', Mr Brian Hudson, at the Extraordinary Meeting
arranged by the LIPS crowd / mob in October 1999. Interestingly the meeting was not
attended by Mr Norman Scarth & Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, both of whom knew they were
to be acting as Secretary and President of the crowd / mob, as the organisers of the crowd
had arranged at an earlier meeting in Leeds.
Most definitely NOT for Mr & Mrs Average, NOT for the serfs to know of. Just
impressive private thoughts. Why NOT in the public domain?
- On the left the suppressed realities in the Hudson
- The brief statement simply intended for
presentation to targeted 'victim-suckers and serfs' primed / conditioned for conversion to
and adoption of the system as is, as covered in the page where we state the harsh
realities and deal with the activities of another 'victim of the divorce industry'.
[*Link from here to
the page where we raise the issue of CORRUPTING CONDITIONED VICTIMS OF THE COURTS
& LEGAL CIRCLES care of the facility in place for depletion of the national budget
through the abused courts service & CONTEMPT FOR the LAW].
- We refer to a converted lover and front line
maintenance engineer of the system of operations who was sent along to abuse our readiness
to work with victims & to test our grasp of the criminal activities ongoing in and
through abuse of the courts.
- On the right a letter from 'The Campaign for A
Fair Hearing', to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir. Paul Condon. As usual
such matters are not for Mr & Mrs Average to know of. Such realities are simply
suppressed as the Intellectual Prostitutes and their editors arrange in conformity with
pre-existing plans for the serfs of planet earth. [*Link
from here to the page where we published the long
existing plans of the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on
planet earth, 'mother gaia'].
a letter to the police
Some letter indeed. One of the many 'private love letters', to the reckless, to the
indifferent and to the creators of the New World Order of Ethics & Morals.
|The reader / researcher should note that Mr Hudson submitted his
own Brief Statement of Facts by FAX to Mr Andrew Yiannides for the intended RELEASE OF THE
FACTS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, the Internet. As with other converts to & lovers of the
system, all simply wishing to put pressure to bear on the abusers of the courts
facilities, for a number of reasons that should be obvious to Mr & Mrs Average, he
changed his mind within two days. Need anyone to ask what transpired in the meantime? We
need only add that Mr Bryan Hudson was one of a number, represented by Mr Johan Michael
Richard Foenander for the SPECIAL MISSION OF THE LATTER TO AUSTRALIA, in the Spring of
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
The obvious covered in the
exclusive page where we specifically point to the abused facilities for rampant
constructive frauds on the taxpayers, is the most essential of realities commanding
attention. Other concerned citizens and awakened researchers are publishing in the public
domain, on the Internet, in group supported web-sites and personal web-pages their own
conclusions. The material we reproduce and publish, with additional input from the founder
of human-rights (NGO), Mr Andrew Yiannides, should go some way in awakening 'the spirit
of man' in all true humans, thinkers, concerned citizens - taxpayers. We expect and
anticipate of such persons to snap out of the indoctrinated states that have been
imposed on them by the agents and partners of the
organisers of such crimes against humanity. [*Link to a convert-lover and
pro-actively engaged user of the rampant fraud on the taxpayers through abuse of the
courts processes and facilities].
The two links in the preceding statement point to TWO DIFFERENT PERSONS, both of whom
started as victims of the evil activities through abuse of the courts facilities AND BOTH
CONVERTED TO LOVERS OF THE ACTIVITIES covered in the official statement by the Chairman of
the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (above). The states and impositions subsist
ONLY BECAUSE OF THE ACTIVITIES & MENTALITY OF SUCH FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS who go
about wilfully imposing their perverted / corrupted vies on the issue of use of the courts
facilities, from within all pseudo-democracies, which the founder of human-rights (GO)
recognised over 50 years ago, while a student at the English School in Nicosia Cyprus. We
respectfully request of our visitors to access the following pages: /protocol.htm /humraped.htm /intropro.htm and to consider, as a starting point the lessons by
examples stated in the page where we expose one of the most evil lovers of the system of
'dictatorship through the courts imposed in all pseudo-democracies'. The link above (*LX)
takes the reader to the explicit comparison of lessons learned by a young inquisitive boy
while at junior school; one exposes the vile truth suppressed by alleged spiritual leaders
of 'the sons of men' on planet earth. The clearly stated plans of the evil ones as
delivered to Ptolemy of Egypt over 2300 years ago, are A MUST FOR ALL VICTIMS OF THE
DICTATORSHIPS IMPOSED THROUGH JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS. Most, if not all, followers of the
evil plans for 'the sons of men (humans) on planet earth are subjecting 'the sons of men
to such states, with impunity'.
2. We urge readers to note the reference to Legal Aid assisted cases ONLY. In
other words NOT all divorce cases were taken into account by the National Audit Office. In
the circumstances, Mr & Mrs Average, 'the serfs & victims' should consider the
reality that as far as the Public Accounts Committee and the media barons are concerned,
SINCE Mr & Mrs Average allow others to string them along, the government, our
representatives in the House of Commons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained &
maintained by the media barons, DO NOT GIVE A DARN about the state of 'the family of man'.
Others, however will be used to encourage the victims of the abusers of public office and
other public facilitates / services in order to chase more public funds, as Mr Frank
Schaeffer identified in the 1990s and points out in his work [Link to the
specific extract from the work, in our quotes page]. Wake up 'serfs' - access the material in the quotes page and then return to the
following *Link in order to access the material we
point to; read it and learn of the evil forces that have been at work for over 2300 years,
as Mr Andrew Yiannides recognised decades ago while looking into, searching for the truth
of the matter, the roots of the problems IMPOSED on 'the serfs' by abusers of trust
Back to HomePage
Back to Top of Page KEY