h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

chancellor.htm               KEY Page Changes 25/04/2008
Lord Chancellor (Page created Feb. 1997)

others on Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law [*Link] and ACT with others against the offenders who Act In Contempt of the Law. Work towards the case FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY [*Link to how extensive the fraud through abuse of the courts facilities, in contempt of Parliament's Law]

UKFathers.co.uk  lbduk.org :
Visitors are invited to access the site we point to & THEY MUST THEN access the explicit page where we reveal what transpired after we set about challenging the denial of rights to the  targeted, discarded father & dildo. Hell broke loose after the gestation vessel went for a different dildo. She was simply being used by the organisers of the RAMPANT FRAUD (on) & CORRUPTION (of) SOCIETIES THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, evidently with the blessings of ALL Public Servants and 'the citizens(?) representatives in Parliament

KEY to Page & Site
Protection Racket - PROOF
SITE Pages
Page & Site ISSUES - List
1. Free For All - Fraud
2. Morals and Morality
3. Legal/Judicial/Cabals
4. Copyright Law & Judges
5. Judges CREATE Fraud
6. <>
Euro Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9  Free TO THINK +
Article 10 Free2 Share Info
Article 11 Join / Assemble
Letters TO - List
August 2003 ECourtHR
April 2003 Frank Field MP
Mar. 2003 Law Society +  Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
Aug.1998 Lord Chancellor
Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR to Client
2. Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng 95
2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 01
4. H/gey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting - LIES 
6. Norman Seeks Info 2003
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. Illiterate L. C. Dpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 03
Page NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. <>  - List
Site IMAGES - List
1. L. E. S. Article D. Blunkett 
Page CHANGES - List
1. New Material & Links

On the right / main window, images & the text of our two page letter to the Lord Chancellor in August 1998. [*Link]

We publish below an article from The Times of 18th April 1996; it covers MORALS
morals95.jpg (184955 bytes)

Submissions covering Legal Aid Facilities added to the 'page' in the panel bottom-left.


Below another article from The Times of 27th May 1997
pubchojr.gif (41125 bytes)
Public to help choose judges' qualifies the article. 
Matters referred to the Home Office by the Prime Minister in November 1999. *Link from here to our letter of 18th December 1998 to the Home Secretary & consider the simple fact that the issues referred and pointed to were CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by alleged Public Servants who engaged in BLUNT FRAUD on the taxpayers & the national Budget, hence the reasons why the Prime Minister directed that the submissions to 10 him, at Downing Street be forwarded to the Home Secretary / Home Office..   
pmlen99r.jpg (33033 bytes)
(Back to Police: letter from Tony Blair  National Scandal: Letter from Prime Minister (above)
We thanked the Prime Minister for recognising that criminal activities are matters for the police to investigate and for referring the issues to the Homer Secretary / Office. ltpmd99f.jpg (103179 bytes)

The FAX below was called for after the member of the human-rights.org Community on Line, had been informed that 'three judges, who looked at the application to the ECHR, had determined that the case had not been concluded in the UK. The author of the letter informed the member, also, that the documented evidence lodged at the ECHR would be destroyed in a year's time. Arrogance or a joke? Read below our submissions to the promoter of the proposition to destroy the evidence. READ OF YOUR RIGHTS - the law applicable to the facts and to the proposed action.
ecsf1auf.jpg (96373 bytes)

ecsf2auf.jpg (131990 bytes)
Link to the TEXT in HTML for links to and from the content of the explicit content / document.

The response, below is from the European Court of Human Rights. ecrbdtrr.jpg (49749 bytes)
The exceptional action taken by the ECoHR staff came about as a result of unacceptable assertions & appropriate challenges by us. [*Link]

The article below is from the Daily Mail of 24th May 2003. Just a typical example of the services arranged by the Protection Racket Operators. 
dm24m03f.jpg (217245 bytes)
For more examples that DO ESTABLISH the validity as to Facilities For Rampant Fraud Through The Courts we invite  visitors readers researchers to access FOUR briefly stated comparable cases that exhibit more than enough. [*Link

November 1996, in the news ongoing attempts to change the record, at the European Court of Human Rights, attached and arising out of the activities of solicitors & barristers engage in with the blessings of judicial chair occupants, police and Ministers in control of the judiciary & police. 
mack96r.jpg (198520 bytes)
[*Link from here to THE challenges attached to one of the cases pointed to, in the letter to Lord Mackay, published in this page]. *Link from here, also, to the image of a letter we sent to the abusers of the Legal Aid facilities in one of the cases pointed to the Lord Chancellor. The text of the letter in HTML format for links to and from is published in the page *linked to from here

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page last revised:  August 27, 2012.
Site reconstruction for better navigation. Ongoing improvements and additions to existing pages.

PAGE HIGHLIGHT:  Lord Irvine addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee on 2nd November 1999. "I would be the first to admit that Legal Aid has not been the most popular public social service. What my party won the general election on was the proposition and the pledge that we put schools and hospitals first, not legal aid first." [*Link to the relevant page]

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting out time and securing support through many a crocodile tear.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Home-Page for The Lord Chancellor

and his office
Access and read the letter to Lord Mackay, in October 1995
and consider the images of articles in the press, thereafter, reproduced in this page

This and other associated pages are dedicated to matters arising out of the free for all practices through which the violations of the rights of citizens in the course of court proceedings by the legal professions.  Entertained, and or freely aided, and abetted by the staff of the courts; also in many an instance by persons who purportedly act in a JUDICIOUS (do note the word your Lordship) capacity and not merely through the much revered, and relied upon, independence of the restraints of law, while in judicial office for and in pursuit of other goals and other ulterior motives. Such 'mentalities' were exposed in the Downing Street Years* when their Lordships determined that copyright law existed not and that the threatened infringement of copyright ought to be allowed in order to generate, thereafter, more work for the legal boffins and the circles from within which our judiciary rise to public office, allegedly as independent, unbiased and impartial 'judicial persons' who ought not to ignore the principles of the laws they are meant to uphold and apply in all instances before the

Consider the advise below to French judges. Cross refer the issues raised through Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's affidavit*. It covers the activities of Legal/Judicial Cabals (as their victim coined) that operate freely in the United Kingdom. Consider the responses citizens get from the Lord Chancellor's department and or office. The rights in law of the citizens ARE violated systematically in UK courtrooms, and fair comment IS called for*, such as we make through our pages in respect of the 'routine - responses' from the Lord Chancellor's department.*

1995, in April 'The Times', reports that in FRANCE the judges are directed by the Ministry of Justice

    NOTE the closing three lines and OUR SUGGESTION (left hand box with scanned 'Times' article on the right). For over FOUR years we were presenting facts and realities to many in public office and to THE MEDIA.
    NO ONE CARED. All were and appear to be serving other plans in contempt of 'THE LAW'. No one cared about the facts of life within Local Authorities, where the staff had been / were / are operating their own Housing Benefit scams and organised frauds on the taxpayers and helpless landlords, abandoned to the whims of fraudsters in control of public services and the legal system, the retired citizens with a small income from their investment in a residential, ex matrimonial / family home.>>> The citizens' own PENSION rights to the products of their labours. 
    Now we are told the Lord Chancellor is acting  AT LAST, as in the marquee below qualified.  The police, promised to bring about prosecutions against persons who worked with and WERE USING others for their own distribution schemes for the Housing Benefit Funds. The funds were/are ENTRUSTED TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES by Central Government to meet the costs for the occupation of properties, belonging to private landlords, by claimants. WE await to see how other public servants are to behave now and how they are treated by the participating in and benefiting from the scams, defaulting police authorities.

morals95.jpg (184955 bytes)

1995, June-July, The FESTIVAL OF RIGHTS

In the course of the Festival of Rights (1995) Mr Andrew Yiannides submitted that: - 
    "The public needs a right by law, whereby any citizen can object to the appointment of any person to judicial office by stating the grounds upon which the person should not be appointed. When such a 'safety valve is in place' persons aspiring to judicial office will know that the public is looking over their shoulders and in the course of their legal services career will think twice before acting improperly when representing members of the public". [*Link to a press release 2 years after these submissions by Mr A Yiannides, in the course of the debate 'Can We Trust The Judges', The Festival of Rights, Westminster, London]

The submissions were made in the course of the debate 'Can We Trust Our Judges?' [*Link from here to event schedule] and were  repeated in a letter to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng who received also the abridged copy of  "The Breeding Grounds - case"* published in our pages. It was also later submitted to the Stephen Lawrence* Inquiry; Permission was sought by and granted to the Legal Action Group to use the stated case, in their publications.

Back cover of the programme for the Festival. It points to the ideals behind the need for the creation of 'The Alternative Press' (TAP) & the 'Citizens Alternative Precedent  - cases'.
hrfbc95r.jpg (123792 bytes)

  • WE state above the founder's attendance and his submissions. We welcomed the news in May 1999 about cowboy lawyers (*Link to page - Press Release).
  • We have published an explicit letter to his Lordship (that was submitted also to some media editors).
  • The demands in the letter very clear.
  • The parts that court officers and Legal Aid Board (now Legal Services Commission) PLAYED AND PLAY in the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises, ongoing as we type these words.
  • The long letter to the Lord Chancellor, with our founder's demands in July 1999, covers much and specific cases / court file - records.
  • The letter appears in thumbnail images in the left column; the content is published in HTML for and because of the facility to link to and from words in the content.
  • Compare the exposures and the challenges in our pages and the pages at other web-sites that we point or link you to.
  • Consider the defaults and omissions by and from within movements / organisations and others who allegedly work for and on behalf or in the interest of the citizens / victims, that we point to
  • Consider the defaults, the omissions and the deceitful and behind the scenes 'blunt activities' by persons who contacted us (were directed / introduced to us) AS challenging victims of the rampant FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES AND FACILITIES.
  • Consider the convenient defaults by the media barons and their editors, who systematically throw dust in the eyes of the citizens and or offer half baked potatoes as information, to the naive, the gullible and the misinformed as of junior school days.
  • PREPARE for the revelations and crystal clear truths and realities going back thousands of years that could not and ought not to have been ignored by 'allegedly moral leaders of humans'. We hinted at what was to come in the course of the Extraordinary General Meeting that the leaders of the LIPS crowd/mob convened in 1999.
  • Many an attempt and 'tempting (as the mischievous fraudsters saw things) invitations and suggestions, in the main TO SIMPLY CASH IN, through knowledge of the system (all were referred to Andrew's reply to 'the judge who reviewed the activities of one and all 'in 'The Breeding Grounds - case' (*Link ) following submissions to the Lord Chancellor's Private Office, in 1992, as with submissions in 1997 when the Lord Chancellor announced the Bill of Rights (*Link and read first the last Order demanded on appeal before you read other pleadings).

Our submissions to the Home Secretary in December 1998, produced results from the government [*Link from here to the evidence including the results as reported in the local press]. Haringey Council received extra funds to cope with the blatant invitations to 'refugees and asylum seekers to the land of milk and honey*, which is how Haringey is marketed by many. The promoted influx to the land of the free for all; dishonesty and deception as practised by public servants, within our Law Enforcement Agencies sphere of influence and blessings [*Link from here to case stated via appeal]. We expose some of the facts in our Local Authority pages and we publish the evidence, FORGERIES used and relied upon in order to steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds. The relevant county court officers were aware of the practices by Council staff and officers; they ignored, statements and evidence attached to other affidavits besides the one we now publish with the attached exhibits. The letter from the Legal Aid Board, exhibit arose out of abuses in the case that we referred to in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority pages.

The Chief Superintendent of the police, within Haringey division, and Sir John Stephens QPM will presently be challenged to account for the performance of the officers under their command, and for other public servants  who misconduct in public office. The police seen to be 'ignoring 'The LAW' and the evidence, particularly after other public servants imposed also criminal damages to the properties of targeted citizens. Such activities (and convenient defaults in the performance of their public duties) in the promotion of their choice of society.

We refer to the society founded and resting on dishonesty, deceptions, fraudulent misrepresentations and BLUNT FORGERIES.  Forgeries and false instruments lacking material facts and accountability by the authors. Of such facts and documented evidence the practices 'in the free for all areas we cover in our web-site'. All care of 'the relevant county court services' in the fraudulent distribution arrangements of the Housing Benefit funds, rents secured for and belonging to others. And reliance on such services by and from the 'relevant county court' referred to in a letter from a member of staff at Haringey Council who wrote with impunity in March 1996 (*Link to the letter).

Following exchanges with the Prime Minister and his private office we wrote on 25th January 2000 to the Lord Chancellor and demanded of his 'dedicated team' (which the Lord Chancellor set up in his department) to call in to their office the county court file pertaining to the Housing Benefit Funds, constructive fraud attempts and the indulgences of all participants in the National Scandal within Haringey, in North London. We demanded that the dedicated team lists all documents the architects of 'their kind of services' provide to the unsuspecting; to the public who fall victims to ILL legal services as we quote in the dedication panel at the top of most pages of our web-site.  GREED* and no respect for the rights in law of others. No respect to LIFE, as the targeted victims AE ENTITLED TO without impositions by criminals, let alone public servants who misconduct in public office and operate as 'automatons in states founded on BLUNT DICTATORIAL and feudal practices by self appointed Lords and Masters operating from within alleged democracies.

Right to a life of ones choice recklessly STOLEN and abducted by the dishonest and deceitful who misconduct in public office* in contempt of the evidence and 'The LAW'* thereby forcing the citizens (not serfs) into a life wasted in front of the very offenders who steal/abducted their rights in law and their lives away, just as the very same circles abducted the Goddess Justice in order to rape her daily in their theatres of 'No Recordings - No Cameras' because they need to protect themselves from the facts and the realities of THEIR VILE PRACTICES.

1995 July, Opposition's Spokes-Person for Legal Affairs in the House of Commons, appreciates
  • The letter on the right with Mr Yiannides' compliments to all converts-to & lovers of the system of operations through abuse of the courts' facilities. (*F4 most important)
  • We refer to persons who crossed our paths or were sent along, with malice aforethought; all acting as maintenance engineers and as lovers of fraud aplenty on the taxpayers, the cash under the table*(LB) as arranged and organised by the managers and controllers of the legal system, the courts..... WAKE UP SERFS, access the explicit revelations in our exclusive page from here.
  • The taxpayers kept in the dark while their contributions to the national budget are simply plundered through abuse of the courts' facilities, with victims of the bluntly organised fraud  electing to keep it all under their hats. (*F5 for developments in 2010)
  • All lovers  the most offensive of the black economy running amok which  NO ONE HAS EVER ADDRESSED.
  • Their objective, to entice or cause Mr Andrew Yiannides to adopt their evil ways.
  • We expose and name some, in explicit pages, because they were not content to go away but WILFULLY SET ABOUT INTERFERING IN OUR WORK & OBJECTIVES. Operating in the background, as the evil within them and or above them, dictate/d/s to such fraudsters.
  • Visitors to these pages, victims chasing Justice, readers of the material we make public and researchers should access first the page where we make public the arrangements in place, as created & organised by the representatives of the citizens and the administrators of Law.
  • Arrogant abuse of trust and the courts' facilities for RAMPANT FRAUD on the taxpayers, 'the serfs' who are kept in the dark about such arrangements. The 'citizens' kept in the dark, not merely by the abusers of Public Office and judicial chair occupation, or simply the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the last, BUT BY MANY AN ALLEGED VICTIM - CHALLENGER WHO CONVERTED TO LOVERS OF THAT WHICH THEY SET OUT TO COMPLAIN OF & ABOUT IN THE FIRST INSTANCE.
  • We refer to persons who elected to and ARE operating as *Fraudsters Club Recruits*, to persons who sold their soul (conscious) to the devil. To persons who made and make it their business to assault and insult the intelligence and integrity of persons who did not succumb to the blackmail or go for the baited hook that lands morons and illiterates in law in the nets of the criminals behind it all and in control of pseudo-democracies. (*F3) 

Short & to the point, a letter from an active Politician / professional with legal background.
pbinte1r.jpg (18550 bytes)
A legal professional and politician of stature, reads submissions he received from Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this website, with interest, Dreamers, converts to and lovers of the abused court facilities, as persons who serve other interests than what they promote to victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies in the United Kingdom, assert and distribute all manner of maligned diatribe as part of their co-operation with and services to abusers of trust and public office.  

In October 1995 an explicit and succinct, on many issues, letter to the Lord Chancellor. Arrogant  abuse of the Courts' facilities and gross contempt for rules of procedure, evidence and THE LAW applicable. BLUNT FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES & use of the courts at the RCJ for conversion of targeted assets to legal costs* [*Link from here to the creme de la creme case when A BLUNT FORGERY was created and introduced, in High Court proceedings, by the legal boffins as part of their invisible services to fraudsters who indulged in commercial fraud. Of such activities the creation of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited >>>.CIUKU Enterprises <<<]

3 October 1995

Lord Mackay of Clashfern
The Lord Chancellor
Houses of Parliament

My Ref. : 30THJOTJ

Your Ref. : Judicial (?) Services



Any person opening mail for the Lord Chancellor to ensure HE RECEIVES THIS LETTER (Suppress not)

Recorded Delivery No. DY 7024 99319GB


Your Lordship

Enclosed herewith the following self explanatory copies of communications / documents:-

  1. My explicit and succinct letter of 29th August 1995 to Master Dyson (RCoJ, CD).
  2. A reply to the above, from a Mrs J Cole(?), dated 4 September 1995.
  3. My junior brother’s explicit and succinct letter dated 15th August 1992 (to which reference is made in the first letter) as was perused by Master Dyson on 23rd August 1995.
  4. Copy of the Originating Summons as was secured from the Courts Records.
  5. Copy of my letter of 2 October 1995 to Mrs Theresia Williamson and Miss Mary Winch.

I hereby demand that you personally initiate enquiries of the relevant Department(s) and respond to the following demands:-

(a) WHERE BE the relevant Court seal (*F5) [Link from here to the page where the facts behind the case are partly stated] and fee endorsements on the Originating Summons? WHAT IS GOING ON AND HOW ARE COURT PROCESSES being used ?
(b) You will duly note that in the response dated 4 September 1995 MR C JOANNIDES (my junior brother) merited no consideration, he was WRITTEN OFF by those who systematically abuse the Court’s processes for personal gain (I draw your attention to the Old Testament ? HOW was Adam’s paradise (Nirvana) terminated by God? Who used Who?

I beg to refer you personally to earlier communications from my person in respect of other abuse4s of the Courts’ processes and blatant breaches of Public Office and DUTY attached to violations of the most fundamental of Human Rights : JUSTICE, a non existent element in our courts. One and all are of the opinion that the Courts are simply THE vehicles through which those practising within can create income generating conditions for one another at the expense of the public at large. Your office received copy of a telegram from "The Fleecing of the Legal Aid Funds – case" (A Mary Winch Affair in the making at about the same time as her case was going on in another Court and another part of the UK). Your office received Copies of FORGERIES as endorsed on High Court Documents (Order, Notice of Appeal, etc.,) and part of an Affidavit by a solicitor endorsed with blatant invitation (indirect) to a Judge to deny Justice and to obstruct, corrupt and pervert it through the usual machinations and ploys, such as the denial to access copies of the relevant Affidavits in the case at hand in order to create further COURT APPLICATIONS until such time as the challenger runs out of funds, THEN to be denied also LEGAL AID through CREATED technicalities (as happened in the Mary Winch Affair) leading to the silencing of the lambs who enter the slaughter houses of our Judicial System, fraught with criminal activities.

AND I beg to draw your attention to the following facts, which YOU should be able to recognise as giving rise and concerns as attached to my need to apply for the relevant copies of the documents perused at Court by the legal boffins and the experts at fleecing the public of funds THROUGH perpetual APPEALS and Court applications BY DESIGN and through abuses of the need to revert to Court proceedings only to find out that there is no such thing as Justice, simply a net and web of machinations and theatrical productions. DO NOTE my junior brother’s reference to DECADENCE !!!! Fail not to seek clarification from Master Dyson as to how he overlooked that statement and SEEK OF HIM TO JUSTIFY his assertions about my brother not liking me (Furnish please copies of Master Dyson’s Psychology Diplomas / Degrees). I fail to see, recognise such element in my junior brother’s letter; therein, however he makes reference to one of the cases I will be exposing through publication of my explicit work on THE machinations by the legal boffins.

Reference is made in my letter AS ARGUED before Master Dyson) to my younger brother and an alleged and or presumed mental condition. THE only person recognised and referred to by the Court (presumably by the legal boffins) is my younger brother’s EVE. That Eve had been separated from my younger brother for over FIVE YEARS. Whilst it may argued that if there had been no divorce proper, she was still his next of keen, IF CERTIFIED. THE IMPLICATION in this instance being that Master Dyson RECOGNISED(S) that one and all in the alleged HIGH COURT Action / proceedings were using THAT EVE for their own financial gain and benefit as events proved subsequently in 1992/3. (Master Dyson’s notes on 23 August 1995 should qualify his observations and thoughts on the date).

THE FACT IS AND REMAINS that I have been denied copies of the relevant affidavits as attached to and perused in the course of those Court proceedings(?). Such failures and activities amount to OBSTRUCTION TO JUSTICE. Seeking to create, through such obstructions and denials of rights (of the right to KNOW WHAT was asserted to the Court in the course of the ALLEGED(!) Court proceedings) need for Appeals and further abuses of Court Time and funds (through legal costs and fees) in itself amounts TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS by persons who should know better.

YOUR LORDSHIP IF THERE BE NO GROUNDS TO COVER UP CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by the so called honourable officers of the High Court then YOU will ensure that the relevant copies of the affidavits perused and adduced to Court by the legal boffins WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ME FORTHWITH and without any waffle and or excuses. I did forward to the Department a copy of my reactions to the income generating practices and conditions as arose out of the Judgement in "The Downing Street Years". THE injunction application by The Sunday Times. Copyright Law exists NOT(!) and if it does, it is in invisible ink, see and know of it NOT(!). The case and judgement as I wrote to Andrew Neil at the time, was not a matter of ‘a thief’s charter (his words) but like that of the parents (author / copyright owners) of a child (book) held at knife point with threats to cut the child to pieces (extracts) by a criminal (Daily Mirror), the parents calling upon the police (the COURTS) to save (stop the threatened infringements of copyright) the child AND THE POLICE REFUSING TO DO SO (not within their power ??) but proceeding to ASSERT "Let him kill the child WE CAN THEN HAVE A TRIAL FOR MURDER". And that your Lordship sums up our judicial services. INCOME GENERATING PRACTICES for one another whilst overlooking Parliament’s Laws. IGNORING APPLICATIONS, DISREGARDING EVIDENCE and going against the grain of common sense and natural JUSTICE, so long as the criminals who are licensed CAN MAKE THEIR KILLINGS in our courts.

In the past YOUR OFFICE received communications, as stated in my letter of response to Miss Mary Winch and Mrs Theresia Williamson. I refer of course to the rogue builder case, which fir the purposes of my work and exposures will be presented as 2The Breeding Grounds – case"; it involved THE POLICE, THE CIVIL AND MAGISTRATES’ COURTS and YOUR DEPARTMENT. The rogue builder was aided, abetted and PROTECTED throughout by one and all. EVEN FORGERIES (false statements in writing, later COUNTERED / CHANGED) were eventually submitted by COURT OFFICERS (Magistrates Court) in order to wrongly and with intent support FALSE ASSERTIONS BY THE POLICE. THE USUAL practices when the Law Enforcement Agencies (Investigative / Administrative) treat the citizens as presumed morons and or serfs of the Middle Ages, and not as citizens with HUMAN RIGHTS.

I demand proper and appropriate attention to this letter; I expect co-operation and above all dedication TO JUSTICE. I DEMAND COPIES OF THE AFFIDAVITS as applied for. I expect no further obstructions to JUSTICE and NO FURTHER IMPOSITIONS FOR AND OR NEED FOR ENDLESS COURT APPLICATIONS AND OR APPEALS(!) as habitually imposed on the unsuspecting public by those who simply aid and abet the silver lining of the pockets of the dishonest who abuse the Court’s processes at the expense of the revenue victims at large.

THE ISSUE IS SIMPLE:- "If the only recorded person FAILED TO INFORM THE COURT OF THE SEPARATION between the two defendants in the action (AND HER SOLICITORS WERE FULLY AWARE OF SUCH FACTS) then FRAUD On the Court itself WAS PERPETRATED. Refusal, therefore, to allow access to the affidavits Implies and Signals that the Court Itself was aware of the fraud and Master Dyson was consciously seeking to obstruct and hinder JUSTICE. As in "The Downing Street Years" and the myriad of court cases, the judiciary serve no justice but the FINANCIAL interests of those from whose circles they arose to public office. In my letter to Mary Winch, wherein I seek permission to use a letter disclosing MALPRACTICE (by the Public Trustee solicitors) I stated that I refuse to accept Master Dyson had never heard of her case and or, for that matter, that of Miss Peggy Wood.

Your Lordship, in the course of a debate (Can We Trust The Judges? - Human Rights Convention, Westminster June 1995) I pointed out that until such time when the ordinary citizen be afforded the opportunity AND RIGHT to challenge the appointments of persons to Judicial office (thereby causing those who aspire to such positions to beware of the public looking over their shoulders) Justice in the United Kingdom will remain in the gutter where it is now. A power in themselves ? No your Lordship. Through Independence of the Judiciary simply FREE TO INDULGE and create, as in £"1 suit breeds 20"; such a wise observation was not borne of fickle minds but of observers of THE PRACTICES as freely indulged into from within.

As THE Supremo of JUDICIAL SERVICES I expect and demand of YOU personally TO Supervise and Justify to the author of this letter THE PRACTICES of YOUR SUBORDINATES, otherwise act and furnish the copies of the Affidavits. Seek not to go down the road of the Constructive Frauds :- "Apply to Court" etc., for my chosen route is simpler and will expose one and ALL FOR WHAT THEY ARE. None will have ANY Defence; they cannot plead and or rely on ignorance of the law because of their own edicts.


Andrew Yiannides
65 Abbott’s Park Road
London E10 6HU


Copy to Lord Justice Woolf.

Read the letter above and then [*Link to the page where the images of copy of the letter, as sent, are published]. Do note that the letter was delivered by Recorded Delivery post to the Houses of Parliament NOT to the Lord Chancellor's Department and IT WAS FOR HIS PERSONAL ATTENTION. At the page, where the link takes one, some of the elements covered are expanded upon. Visitors, readers and researchers should consider the simple fact that one was DEALING WITH ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES in the name of Justice. Read of the tip of the iceberg and HOW followers of the teachings from the most vile of works, ever to have been presented to mankind, engage in the very practice and the element we point to in one of our pages; just one of the many extracts which diligent persons, who STUDY, not simply read the work of *the crafty ones*, should refer to, before misrepresenting it 'through their conditioned and indoctrinated states' as the creators of it all arranged and organise(d) for sale to the naive and gullible, 'to the sons of men on planet earth' by the agents & affiliates of the creators, also blind followers of such works.

In 1996, a year after the above challenges to the Lord Chancellor with the pointers to the facts of life, Lord Mackay was reported to be doing the rounds in Europe. Evidently he was seeking Pan-European alignment with the practices in the UK courts, as the headline below qualifies. Only morons could possibly fail to note that the challenges in October 1995, related to arrogant abuse of public office by the police and judicial chair occupants. The denial of rights part of *intended  damages to the targeted serf*. Needless to say it was all part of and in line with the imposition of the PLANNED-FOR, *DICTATORSHIPS THROUGH THE COURTS IMPOSED*, as covered in the words / conclusions of Mr Andrew Yiannides over 20 years earlier. [*Link from here to the extract from a letter to a senior politician on the very issue]

    *Access from here the page where we published the criminal activities indulged into as organised enterprises by alleged servants of the law and Justice : the police, the courts and alleged Public Servants operating out of the Department run and managed by non-elected Lord Chancellors for centuries. Read of the arrogance of the police, the convenient and criminal in essence defaults, omissions and the promotion of false states and blatant lies by County Court Staff & Officers & WAKE UP 'SERFS'.

    *Access from here the page where we publish another appeal (on the same violated principles as the one in the above link) and recognise the modus operandi, the endemic system of operations instigated and operated by alleged Officers of Justice & the Law, the police, solicitors, barristers and abusers of judicial chair occupation. NOTE the ORDERS SOUGHT on Appeal, then recognise why the Court subsequently told the agents / legal representatives of Enfield Council to enter, of their own, a non suite case. Readers & Researchers, taxpaying 'serfs' should take on board our concerns and consider the root causes -plural intended- for our concerns, after accessing and reading also of the arrangements in place for fraud aplenty on 'the taxpaying serfs' and the corruption of conditioned morons who endorse 'the constructive frauds industry, instigated, processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities as we cover and expose in the exclusive page we point to below.

    *Access from here the page where we relate and cover the ARROGANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES by alleged servants of the public and purported / promoted officers of the Law, the Courts & Justice. Recognise, after choking on the criminal in intent activities we point to, WHY WE NAME & EXPOSE -in our pages- a number of alleged victim-challengers who were not simply ready to endorse the criminal activities by going for the cash under the table -undisclosed, suppressed, not freely accessible to, nor passed on or pointed to the taxpayers- and organising themselves in affiliated networks of alleged legal experts and gurus. One and all, most eager and ready to use new conditioned victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies -officers of the abused court facilities- for MORE OF THE SAME, FRAUDULENTLY CREATED REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO ADOPT the New World Order Code of Ethics by endorsing and suppressing 'the confidential plundering of the national budget, covered and exposed in our pages.

    *Access from here the page where we relate the constructive frauds on a woman victim of abused court activities in a divorce case after she had been subjected to earlier fraudulent court proceedings in a matter of a constructively engineered court case intended to lead to a property repossession, care of the scripts and the scenarios a firm of solicitors set in motion when acting for her, acting also for her father / parents and for a building society too. In the course of both scenarios false instruments lacking accountability, and a blunt falsification, a FORGED document after she had signed it, which criminal activity the police confirmed (after the events) on investigation. YET THE POLICE FAILED TO BRING ABOUT ANY PROSECUTIONS, in the usual manner when it comes to ORGANISED FRAUD BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES. While at the page the links take one to, SCROLL down to the part where 'the organised fraud through the courts instigated and by the courts endorsed, processed and executed are covered / clarified. From the first test, the alleged victim was put to, she established beyond any doubt that she was just another aspiring 'fraudsters-club-recruit', simply a stooge who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob simply seeking and aiming for assistance to secure the usual REWARD to the conditioned victims of the legal circles and the courts so long as they agree to keep it all under their hats and BETTER STILL TO KEEP IT ALL in the family closet, the family of the fraudsters-club-recruits, the club she aspired to join, like those who introduced her to Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights.org and uk-human-rights.org  

mack96r.jpg (198520 bytes)
1997, May, main headline news for 'The Times', proposals relative to judicial appointments

And the maligned, evil fraudsters club recruits, who made contact with offers of co-operation for the DATA warranted (see / read 'The CAMILA Project') carried on failing to deliver upon their promises and undertakings, well over two years by then. Worse, despite such an important announcement from the government, when over 80 of 'the organised / guided / used morons' received a simple invitation [*Link] to co-operate in the matter of "No more theatrics and blunt suppression of the truth, what goes on within the confines of the courts", each and EVERY ONE FAILED TO ACT AS THE INVITATION REQUESTED. Time was of the essence, because ALL were aware of the reasons, the grounds and the purposes for the explicit request. Six years later, in March 2003, one of their soul-mates wrote to Mr Andrew Yiannides, asking for assistance on the very issue which he and his mates contemptuously ignored in 1997  

The news, miraculously after 'morons', received the simple invitation to act as their managers had undertaken.
pubchojr.gif (41125 bytes)
1997, November 'The Times' article by David Panic QC - 'Why the Lord Chancellor is right'. The author informs the readers of such conclusions following Lord Irvine's speech at the annual conference of the solicitors. [*Link from here to the appeal posted to Lord Irvine at the House of Lords & consider the realities in the background. Then enquire of the alleged victim-challengers we name & expose WHY they elected to ignore the challenges released in the Public Domain, IF their only interest was not and remains to cash in on the facilities for FRAUD through abuse of the courts].    
lcn97ta2.jpg (356603 bytes) Visitors, readers and researchers should click on the image on the left and read the article when it is blown up to a size well in excess of the width of most normal video display units. Using the scroll facility at the bottom of the screen facilitates access to all columns. NOTE: In due course we are to release the text of the article in HTML format for links to and from the content.
1997, in December Lord Chancellor Irvine of Large ANNOUNCED THE BILL OF RIGHTS

    The government's intentions to introduce such an Act was no surprise to Andrew, bearing in mind that TWICE the Lord Chancellor's office and Department had been challenged to point to an Act of Parliament whereby successive governments as of 1948 - 1951 EVER ACTED SO, indicating the governments (of any political coloration) to honour the United Kingdom's commitments, as signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, from 1948 to 1998.
    In the meantime fraudsters who sought and  made contact with Mr Yiannides THREE YEARS EARLIER, made promises and undertook to co-operate in and for the creation of the DATA WARRANTED; also to participate in and for the creation of documentaries in video format. All simply busy, in organising themselves as the alternative legal services. Such persons, as victims of  'the system in operation', all ready, willing and in a position to create a new school of actors raring to go and participate in theatrical productions in the courts. All aiming to use victims, they were / are pointed to, as the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob who contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides soon after the lodging of the explicit appeal at Bow County Court, had been pointed. Alleged victims(!) of the master-minds behind the creation of the biggest fraud on the taxpayers, the frauds if not instigated just organised / reorganised and taken to fruition through the legal circles and the courts. In short ORGANISED CRIMES ongoing through the courts with the blessings (not tacit approval) of Ministers as of, the time of the delivery of the New Testament, to the naive and gullible by the ARCHITECTS OF ALL EVIL. 
    We urge victims, readers and researchers to access and consider the element that raises the big question at the top of most of our pages. We refer to the alleged inherent jurisdiction of judicial chair occupants to create of their own and use such a facility through which to absolve public servants (used, as far as we are concerned by successive governments) to defraud the serfs of their assets and rights in law, which rights, the judiciary themselves as alleged guardians of PARLIAMENT'S LAW are sworn to uphold, in allegedly civilised Democratic States, States that allegedly rest and are founded on Law & Order..... the judiciary's perverted creations born of FALSE INSTRUMENTS. 

The announcement bilorigf.jpg (128165 bytes)
No prizes for guessing WHY Lord Chancellor Irvine spoke of and stressed that MORALS & MORALITY were to be the foundations upon which Justice was to be 'dispensed with by the judiciary, care of the provisions the Bill was to incorporate from the CONVENTION RIGHTS, only a mere 50 years after signing up to it.

In August 1998, we posted explicit submissions to the new Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine

    On the right, images of copy of our two-page letter to Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, in August 1998. Anyone who cannot see why in December of the same year the government acted, as soon as the Home Secretary received our letter, should seek help. [*Link from here  to the succinctly stated realities, as submitted to the Home Secretary].

    His Lordship did receive a copy of the exclusive appeal we settled which the targeted private Landlords lodged at Edmonton County Court, the previous year. In the meantime as we were still casting our nets in the direction / area of those we recognised to have been deceitful fraudsters club recruits [*Link from here to list of exposed], we did not release full details of the Housing Benefit fraudulent claims by the Local Authority. We elected so to act, simply because not one of the alleged victim / challengers who contacted us asked to have access / read the appeal, as lodged. However, all were informed at which County Court the arrogant denial of rights and blunt obstructions to Justice. [*Link from here to the appeal

lclau98f.jpg (133649 bytes)
lcau98f2.jpg (127903 bytes)
1998, in December the public is informed that the Judges were up in arms against reform....

    Most impressive the performance of those who set about reforming the structure of British Society. They, who acted in breach of and arrogant violation of the rights of the citizens [*Link to the right violated, as determined and directed by the government of the day] were up in arms and against any reforms in the administration of Justice. We need only point to the explicit UNCONSTITUTIONAL & UNDEMOCRATIC prerogative which the criminals in control of the courts created for themselves as absolute Lords of the Realm and Masters of 'the serfs', otherwise referred to as 'subjects'..... subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted, as the founder of Human-Rights recognised during the tribulations he was subjected to by the legal circles, abusers of judicial chair occupation, the police and the member of Parliament purportedly representing the victim of all.
   The MP may well have been justified and excluded from any accusations / allegations that he was acting in contempt of 'The Law' and the rights assured to the 'citizens of ALL European states and nations' [*Link from here  to an Article of the E.U assuring citizens protection from fraud and corruption through the Combined Treaties]. The MP, Mr O'Haloran was not of a legal background and in fact he was the only MP who never opened his mouth in the House of Commons. He did so, however, when he crossed the floor after announcing that he was joining the gang of four who were disillusioned with the Labour Party's performance at the time.

jurev96r.jpg (130075 bytes)

We made submissions to the Legal Aid Board; documented evidence, & copies of the FORGERIES USED BY THE CRIMINALS WERE DELIVERED in support of and as proof of the scams operated at a much higher level within the Local Authorities. The Legal Aid Board was informed that other evidence existed / exists* in support of our submissions.

on 19 May 1999 the Lord Chancellor announced steps were being taken against cowboy lawyers who USE refugees and abuse the Legal Aid facilities........

Below the FAX as transmitted to the staff at the European Court of Human Rights

We release the content in the public domain, for and in the interest of the victims of the rampant free-for-all that abounds in pseudo-democracies. We act, as we do, in order that our Lords (judicial chair occupants) and Masters (Public Servants and the legal circles) might begin to recognise that the law is no ass and that 'the 'subjects' do have rights, secured and assured in law'. There exists, however, a simple proviso: "Provided, of course that the 'subjected' are not treated as 'serfs' and that they are duly informed by those who know of and accept the founder's simple and realistic proclamation that:
"The law is no ass; an ass is the person who believes it".

The above opinion by a young student who was reading 'The Pickwick Papers' by Charles Dickens while at Secondary Grammar School. As a business man after recognising the rampant abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities at the disposal of criminals, in the United Kingdom, the obvious that had to be pointed to and added to the above proclamation was: 
"However, it would appear that it is administered by asses".

The elements covered in and the implications arising out of the facts and the realities stated in the FAX submissions, below, should suffice and clarify many issues. It should also be used / thrown at the promoters and stooges who, after joining the fraudsters club (*F1), brandish about letters (*F2) such as the member of the Community On Line, Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo, received from Strasbourg. (NOTE: - More facts and revelations in due course. For the time being consider the challenges that we made of the person who wrote to the petitioner, the member of the *human-rights.org Community on Line*. Do not overlook the fact that the Petitioner benefited from prompt dispatch received, by Courier Service the submitted documents lodged at the European Court of Human Rights by Mr Andrew Yiannides who travelled, by coach, to Strasbourg in order to lodge the Petition personally after settling the application, as copied in our pages).  

FAX from: http://www.uk-human-rights.org
To: ECHR - Strasbourg (Ref.: KMR/HC/gz) Fax: (0033) 3 88 41 27 30
From: Andrew Yiannides - London - UK Date: Converted 18/09/03 Created: 24 Aug. 2003
Re: Ms J.R. Baldwin Del Castillo (CoL) Pages: TWO
CC: Folders : CoL / Affiliates / Gov. /Courts Reference: RODFECHR
¨ Urgent ¨ Please ACT ¨ Please Comply ¨ Please acknowledge ¨ Please Recycle


Attention K Reid Fourth Section


Dear Madam

Re: Baldwin v United Kingdom
        Application no: 19229/02

Your communication of 29th July 2003, has been referred to us by the above named, who is a member of the human-rights.org Community On Line.

The Petitioner's request was clear. She requested for the return of the bundle of documents that were delivered to the court with her petition last year. The documents were lodged for the sole purpose of a ruling by the court in respect of the clearly stated facts leading to the violations that were succinctly pleaded in her petition. In accordance with the information, at hand, the petitioner received a communication from the court, in late February. At the time she was informed that in accordance with the views of the judges, who applied themselves to the case before the Court, her case did not qualify for a review by the Court, apparently, because her case had not been processed to extinction of domestic remedies. [*Link from here to the reality and what subsists behind such presentations]

In view of the above the Petitioner quite rightly wrote to request for the return of her bundle of the documented evidence in order that she should proceed by way of submissions to the appropriate government department and Minister. In accordance with the documented evidence, the warranted claims arose out of the reckless behaviour of public servants albeit persons who were/are retained to serve Justice and the citizens, within the restraints of law.

Following on from the above we beg to remind you that under United Kingdom legislation it is a criminal offence to destroy evidence and or to obstruct justice. By the very nature of the court's earlier communication to the Petitioner, her case is very much alive. The very submissions rendered the documents, which are part of the evidence against the offending government / state agents and employees relate to protected work and documents warranted and essential for and in the Petitioner's demands for justice. We take the view that we ought not to have to point out to you such fundamental issues and principles, bearing in mind that your retainer, as a public servant, is to serve Justice and the citizens, and no other interests.

You are, hereby requested to comply with the Petitioners requests, to consider her rights in law and to refer this communication to the President of the Court. You are requested to point us to any Article of the Convention, or to any provisions under any court rules, from within any civilised country or state, whereby the destruction of evidence in an ongoing case, at and in any court, is acceptable and or endorsed as appropriate and excusable through the type of promotion that you submitted to the Petitioner.

The Petitioner repeats through us her request for immediate return of the bundle of the documented evidence, as presented to / lodged with the court in support of her legally sound Petition. The Petitioner also repeats her readiness to meet in advance, if necessary, the cost of the dispatch and the delivery to her of her properties constituting the evidence in support of her legitimate claims.

We beg to draw your attention to the fact that the preparation of and the cost for the creation of the bundle of the documented evidence was not born by the court or anyone from within the United Kingdom section / representatives. We reiterate that the case is neither dead nor finished as you or any other may have set out to create through obstructions and ill-founded assertions. The documented evidence which you assert the right to destroy rather than return to the legitimate owner constitutes possible wilful obstructions to Justice, maligned impositions to additional costs and the continued abduction of a life (the use of the time of the citizen who lodged a Petition with the court) bearing in mind that the reasons given by the court for failing to address the legitimate issues make it very clear that you and the court are dealing with an alive case and claims.

In view of the above you are requested to reconsider your ill-founded assertions, to ensure that your section / the court arranges for the return of the bundle of documents to the citizen and to cease all attempts to treat the bundle of the documented evidence as trash can material in contempt of the fact that you and the court are dealing with an alive case.



Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS.
*human-rights * (NGO)
London - UK

Important UPDATE Below

  • We point (direct from other pages and the access buttons) visitors to the above 'challenges' to the ECoHR for the simple reason that we are very familiar with the ploy promoted for the umpteenth time. Visitors, readers and researchers should consider the changes in practice - REPORTING PETITIONS & SETTLEMENTS REACHED and the earlier case stated in one of the images whereby the taxpayers are informed BY US, that the case after a private settlement was removed from the court's list. WHO BUT THE SUCKERS / TAXPAYERS PAID & PAY FOR AGREED SETTLEMENTS IN THAT AND EVERY OTHER CASE?
  • Assertions that the case, at hand, did not finish in the United Kingdom, allegedly, because it did not go all the way to the House of Lords, imply another scenario and we will cover it at some later date.
  • Visitors, who wish to familiarise themselves WITH THE VIOLATIONS PLEADED in the above applicant's case, should link to the facts stated << apologies for the broken link, please access the explanation below at <<< after reading the facts as stated in the application to the European Court of Human Rights (repeated at this website at). We link visitors, who took time to read the above challenges, from here to the reply from the European Court (above in the left margin / window / frame).
  • We released, in April 2006, more relevant information in respect of the realities behind the ploy - dust in your eyes suckers, taxpayers. [*Link]
  • We need only state that in the Stated Facts there was ore than enough covering ALL violations, in order to deal appropriately with 'the usual ploy'. She was informed that we would be doing so the Strongest Possible terms and that the challenges would be published in our pages and that it would all be released to the world's 'targeted serfs'.
  • We need to inform visitors that the applicant failed to proceed with execution of the Power of Attorney instrument that Mr Andrew Yiannides settled for her to execute/endorse.
  • Some months later the applicant came back with an alternative Power of Attorney that was suggested by a solicitor she used for the sale of her flat in London. At the same time she was informing us that the Local Authority were chasing her for non-payment of Council Tax, for periods AFTER the sale / occupation of the flat by another. FOOD FOR THOUGHT as to the likely scenario ladies and gentlemen.
  • n the meantime, because the agreement for the work done for the applicant included handing over ALL of the documents, in her case, to Mr Yiannides and to human-rights, the applicant complied. She had been informed that the application to the ECoHR entailed putting one's foot in the door, at the ECoHR in a way that the compensation could not be evaded by governments that maintain Rampant Corruption Jockeys* (*definition) in the courts.


  • Because of obstructions and interference in our work for the Community on Line, by persons we are naming, and others we shall be naming in due course, we are making other arrangements for the essential exposures & challenges to the wolves, the organisers of the lives of 'the sheeple' : the sucker-serfs in a pseudodemocracy.
  • We refer, above, to the work of co-operating members (and ex-members) of the human-rights.org Community on Line, also, to other pro-active citizens who state their experiences in pseudo-democracies, thereby covering and exposing the facts of life in permanent pages on the Internet.
  • We will be introducing links to important material, thereby informing the citizens who have taxes imposed on them by persons who are very much aware of the ORGANISED CRIMES : the subsisting states [*Link from here to list of sites].
  • Read below of email exchanges with 'a concerned(?) sucker-serf(!) who ignored the elements, the practices and the legal issues we have been challenging and EXPOSING WITH THE ESSENTIAL & WARRANTED PROOF. We refer to the proof attached to the criminal activities : to THE RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD IMPOSED ON THE TAX-PAYERS through abuse of the courts facilities. [*Link from here to the exclusive page & to proof]
  • We have been pointing to and EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, at this website, care of Andrew Yiannides' research and investigations (ongoing for over 38 years).
  • Readers, researchers and victims should access the exclusive page (use link above) and consider the simple fact that the person seeking information as to WHY the human-rights.org Community on Line free websites went down, like all other charlatans and dreamers NEVER CONTACTED US or Mr Andrew Yiannides in order to raise any interest or express any concerns about the obvious : the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ORGANISED & IMPOSED on the tax-payers through abuse of the courts facilities by alleged servants of the public, servants of the law and Justice..... just another product of the society that 'reared him'.
EMAIL addressing the suppressed / ignored issue of ORGANISED CRIME: -
From:      "humanrights1@Safe-mail.net"  humanrights1@Safe-mail.net
To:          "yiandrew@yahoo.com"  yiandrew@yahoo.com

Cc:          "mail@urrights.ning.com"   mail@urrights.ning.com
Sent:        Fri, 15 October 2010 12:59:31

THE ENQUIRY in October 2010: -

Hi does anyone know why free website space WWW.HUMAN-RIGHTS.ORG has gone down?


THE RESPONSE: > with minor corrections to errors as edited below <: -

Who wishes to know friend?

The owner of the domain name KNOWS and informs you herewith APPROPRIATELY. The owner is now in command and made the necessary changes following 11 years of foul of the law experiences with charlatans and fraudsters. Collectively they established much through their ACTIVITIES AND MOST CONVENIENT FAILURES, without any room for doubt.

In the first instance, it was the officers, the executives and members of staff of the USA Corporation Northsky.com. They entered into a contract with the owner.... "to provide the free spaces under the control of the proponent and creator of the 'Community on Line', LONG BEFORE, myspace, facebook, etc. friend", and it was not long before the owner / creator WAS FACED WITH BREACHES OF CONTRACT and 'the abduction of HIS PROPERTY, as he allowed the abusers to use it, for their VILE / EVIL ENDS... because he had HIS plans for abusers of trust and arrogant dreamers, charlatans and stooges / fraudsters.

THE OWNER, ALSO, had to put up (for years) with 'alleged victim-challengers', who failed to co-operate with the creator / owner of THE SPECIFIC INTERNET PRESENCE & DOMAIN. In other words persons who signed up for the free web-sites facility JUST IGNORED THE REASONS & WERE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE PROVISIONS (stipulations goes without saying) as covered in the web-pages: -
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/tap.htm
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/cap.htm
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/yourrights.htm
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4deceit.htm
6. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

The last three URLs relate to and address the parts of LOVERS of the facilities in place for REWARDS to persons who agree to keep quiet about the REWARDS FROM STOLEN TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET. The very fraudsters, dreamers, charlatans and stooges just promoting the powers that be, through subliminal indoctrination / conditioning scripts. One and all simply working with the abductors and rapists of Justice…. >>> by TARGETING new victims of the abusers of the courts facilities, AS DIRECTED / POINTED TO THE NEW VICTIMS by the controllers & managers OF THE BLUNT & ARROGANTLY ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS [*Link to an explicit case / letter]. All and everything as ARRANGED by the abusers of the public facilities, clearly covered in the page number 4, above..... and THE MANY who failed to act as invited to co-operate.... simply obliged & provided the warranted evidence (Refer to the House of Lords ruling published at www.uk-human-rights.org).

Refer please to the proof of posting cards in the page number 5, above. DO MAKE SURE THAT YOU READ ALL OF THE MATERIAL in the page, number 5. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE how the owner, whose Community on Line concept was treated with blunt contempt by alleged victim-challengers, used the letter from one of the many dreamers, alleged victim-challengers who, as an accredited FRAUDSTERS-CLUB-RECRUIT, failed, on far too many instances to co-operate…. with the exception that he WAS co-operating with others who, like him, were / are targeting and using new victims FOR MORE OF THE SAME CASH UNDER THE TABLE (the conditional) REWARDS covered in the page number 3, above.

DO READ all of the material in the page number 6, above, and CONSIDER THE ARROGANCE OF THE ONE who contacted the owner of the domain, the PROPONENT / CREATOR of the COMMUNITY-ON-LINE concept..... AFTER he had agreed to keep it all in the family closet (the family of fraudsters) as his solicitor wrote to another solicitor.... [*Link from here to the proof - to the solicitors letter, chum]

AFTER you have swallowed that reality, do access and read the telephone exchanges between that dreamer / fraudster and the one whose letter was used to create the page number 4, above. READ the transcript of the telephone exchanges, and note the words 'wasting knowledge'. THERE & THEN RECOGNISE WHY THE EXPRESS USE OF THE WORD >>> WASTING <<< (if not for gain..... for THE REWARDS ON OFFER AT THE END OF THE LINE, clearly covered in the page number 4, above???).

The telephone exchanges / transcript you should access at: -  
7. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm
READ IT all, for as a whole the material….. PLUS THE EVIDENCE released in the page SHOULD CAUSE TRUE HUMANS.... to consider WHY was the owner of the domain and creator of the Community on Line, TARGETED for and with the idiotic attempt related in the page:
8. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/contract.htm

CONSIDER THIS RESPONSE and the information imparted herewith; consider also the attached evidence released and pointed to in the public domain... thereby ESTABLISHING THE OBVIOUS..... as to WHY & WHAT FOR, the human-rights.org Community on Line concept.

The realities / realisations YOU ARE POINTED TO, ONLY TRUE HUMANS could / can recognise; more specifically TRUE HUMANS as thinkers, as users of grey matter, SHOULD RECOGNISE as to WHY the attempt related / covered in the page number 8, above.

TRUE HUMANS could NOT fail to consider the simple fact that THE REWARDS TO ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS who fell and fall in love with the arrogantly organised CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS were / are IMPOSING DEBT-LIABILITIES on fellow 'sheeple' and on their own successors...... as the morons, zombies and conditioned ill-educated non-thinkers each and every person who failed to co-operate and COLLECTIVELY EXPOSE & CHALLENGE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES and public office as 'shitizens' established themselves to have been / be.

Access also the material in the page:
9. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
READ of the foundations / of the root of the divide and manipulate & control 'the sons (no daughters) of the men (no women) on earth, as concocted by the creators of the Old Testament RUBBISH .... the very RUBBISH promoted by affiliates, associates and followers of the RUBBISH for some 2300 years... as of the days when the rubbish was introduced to mankind. Do access and read the article by Sir Frederick Kennyon, which you SHOULD find at: -

9. http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org/
FINALLY, do consider the extract, below, from the work of Isocrates 'Aeropagiticos'. Thereafter let me know IF mankind (*the sons of men*), needed the RUBBISH, for 2300 years promoted as alleged Holy Scriptures, when in fact those of and about whom Isocrates wrote in his ‘Aeropagiticos’ work: - 'WERE CHERISHING JUSTICE IN THEIR SOULS', unlike the creations of the alleged creator of all and everything was / has been creating judges FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES as covered in the Old Testament RUBBISH, too.

Do access the page: XXXXXXXXXXXX 
10. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/quotes.htm
READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of 'The Bible' (where they also included the Old Testament RUBBISH for users of grey matter to take on board and conclude accordingly as TRUE HUMANS / AS THINKERS / AS USERS OF LOGIC.


Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Presently also webmaster@human-rights.org  
Profile at Live Dot Com: http://yiandrew-human-rights.spaces.live.com/default.aspx  

FOR 'the rampant FRAUD & CORRUPTION' that abounds in most allegedly 'civilised states', access the exclusive page:
For PROOF of the collaboration, between the Executive & the Administrative, in such states / the UK, read below the explicit arrangements for 'the serfs': -
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an action brought in respect of an act of State."
The above qualify 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'

Enlightenment for the products of the system : the fraudsters-club-recruits & maintenance engineers of the system who seek to offend and obstruct genuine challengers who EXPOSE the criminals: -
From Isocrates' Aeropagiticos:
"But in fact, they thought, virtue is not advanced by written laws but by the habits of every-day life; for the majority of men tend to assimilate the manners and morals amid which they have been reared. Furthermore, they held, that where there is a multitude of specific laws, it is a sign that the state is badly governed; for it is in the attempt to build up dikes against the spread of crime that men in such a state feel constrained to multiply the laws. ***

Those who are rightly governed, on the other hand, do not fill their porticoes with written statutes, but only to cherish justice in their souls; for it is not by legislation, but by morals, that states are well directed, since men who are badly reared will venture to transgress even laws which are drawn up with minute exactness, whereas those who are well brought up will be willing to respect even a simple code". ***

The above is dedicated to ALL abusers of Andrew Yiannides' time and the trust they were allowed to benefit from while their activities and most convenient defaults / failings were being investigated.

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..


   1.    Visitors are urged to access the page where we expose the most blunt and arrogant of Institutionally Organised Crime, that of Constructive Frauds through abuse of the courts facilities. At the page we point out to more than the arrogant parts which Public(!) Servants(?) take on and execute while Acting IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW. Theft of assets through False Instruments* [*Link] in the order of the day. False instruments being ANY COURT ORDER that is issued in contempt of the evidence adduced to and perused at court, by judges who elect to ignore the evidence and applicable law. Similarly when the evidence establishes a criminal act, as for instance in the case of FORGERIES CREATED & USED for fraudulent gains (such as the documents used and relied upon by Haringey Council staff and officers [*Link to proof], in order to steal and cause to be converted, Housing Benefit funds due and owing to a targeted family whose property was occupied by 'the New World Order imports' (used refugees). And judicial chair occupants acting contrary to the evidence (the blunt Forgeries) IN CONTEMPT OF THE APPLICABLE LAW. The PAGE WE POINT TO, from here, covers the element of VICTIMS OF THE COURTS (of judicial misconduct as covered herein-before) WHO MANAGE TO LODGE PETITIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COURT of HUMAN RIGHTS, are invited and caused to entertain a confidential pact whereby they are REWARDED FOR BEING PARTY TO MAINTAINING SILENCE ABOUT THE ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES. And all with the blessings of the police, and successive governments for God knows as of when. [*Link also from here to the page where we expose the parts of organised fraudsters club recruits. We refer to persons who engage in fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities and processes as one Johan Michael Richard Foenander was initiated in by another 'conscript to fraud aplenty through the courts executed IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & the taxpayers deliberately kept in the dark in an allegedly civilised society. A society that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law & order, according to the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain in order to promote the false states which they have the audacity to refer as Democratic States. ALL CARE OF THE SILENT ONE'S, the conditioned & programmed robots who fall to the bait of the BLACK ECONOMY operated through the abused courts, while Members of Parliament ignore their constituents' representations and complaints;*link from here to the page where we released an explicit House of Lords precedent case dating back to 1940 when their Lordships addressed such issues of applicable law].
    2.   Many the maintenance engineers and promoters of the rampant fraud through the courts. Most intriguing and naive the activities of persons who run around brandishing and promoting letters from abusers of public office. One such person was a Mr G. Ebert; apparently he was furnished with a letter from Charring Cross police station, whereby the police were informing him that allegedly / apparently HE HAD THE RIGHT TO INFORM THE PUBLIC that the police had been instructed by the Lord Chancellor / his office NOT TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINTS RELATIVE TO PERJURED STATEMENTS IN THE COURTS, the judicial chair occupants apparently free to ignore all manner of criminal acts in their courts. The aforesaid gentleman set about to impress, with that rubbish of an allegedly legal and binding assertion, also Mr. Andrew Yiannides the founder of human-rights. The promoter of that rubbish was politely asked to furnish Mr Yiannides with a copy of the impressive document BUT the promoter flatly refused to make available the requested copy. Mr. Yiannides thereafter requested for assistance and arranged with Mr. Norman Scarth (who would co-operate in such areas because it suited his personal and undisclosed agenda) to secure a copy of the offending promotional material. Visitors can link to what followed thereafter AND RECOGNISE the wisdom of the adages 'Empty Tins Make Loud Noises' & 'All That Glitters Is NOT GOLD'.
*Link from here to the exclusive page*, where we cover the parts of an alleged victim-challenger who abused Mr Andrew Yiannides' time and trust with evil intent. The need arose to expose the actress, Veronica Beryl Foden, for her deceitful ways and maligned intentions; the same applied to her associates from within the LIPS crowd / mob and their affiliates, individuals and organised groups. We need to emphasise that EVERYONE WE NAME & EXPOSE WAS NOTED TO HAVE BEEN A CONVERT-TO & LOVER OF THE RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS INSTIGATED, PROMULGATED & EXECUTED. Not victim-challengers, but lousy actors of the worst denominator, not far below the directors of the shows they took and take part in. *Link also from here to the page (.org/confraud.htm) where we cover and expose the facilities in place, the baited hook for converting conditioned morons to lovers of silver through the cash under the table facility : UNDECLARED REWARDS *income* as clarified in the very page. *Link also from here to another page where we published a letter sent to the FRAUD DEPARTMENT of the Social Services (Work & Pensions) in respect of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on the National Budget (*Social Security funds*) attached to and arising out of the use of Housing Benefit provisions. Funds handled by FRAUDSTERS EMPLOYED AND USED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES, who WERE & ARE USING *Asylum Seekers and Refugees* rushing to the land of milk and honey, *to the United Kingdom where the FREE-FOR-ALL-FACILITIES* rule supreme, AS ORGANISED BY ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC, the public they are meant to serve in accordance with the law and NOT pursuant to undeclared policies that never were part of any 'ticket / manifesto' the serfs voted for and in in favour of. All care of promotions by the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain, for such scenarios at the cost of the targeted 'sons of men on planet earth'. The REALLY concerned can access from here a scenario which we reproduce for the 'taxpayers and victims' to read in order to awaken to the plans of the founding fathers of most, if not all, of man's inhumanity to man related / recorded in 'The Old Testament'.
    4.   *Link from here to the page Andrew created on receipt of a letter from Mr Norman Scarth, when Mr Scarth set out, in October 2003, to justify his abuse of the time and trust of Mr. Andrew Yiannides. Mr. Scarth had, for years, been promoting views in respect of his alleged concerns born of the experiences he benefited from as a victim of the abused legal system / court facilities. We cover the method of operations in the courts in an exclusive page (.org/confraud.htm) and we urge all visitors, readers and researchers, especially VICTIMS TO ACCESS THE PAGE and get to know how 'victims of the legal circles' CONVERT TO LOVERS OF THE FRAUD they were victims of to begin with. The element of utmost importance in the matter at hand is Mr Scarth's alleged 'Cause For Concern'. He wrote of such matters in a 'book' he created covering his experiences and his stance as 'a hero', who, nonetheless, 'fell in love with the fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities, as can be adduced by his behaviour and activities as of the days he agreed to assume the position of Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd / mob in the course of a meeting (at his place of residence) that was attended only by other converts-to and USERS OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS in the courts. So it was and remains the situation with all of his associates from within the LIPS crowd / mob and their affiliates. Mr Norman Scarth who invariably considered himself to be a cut above every other victim of the legal circles and would take it upon himself to dispense with advise to Andrew such as, "Use the KISS principle Andrew : Keep It Simple Stupid'. It goes without saying that Mr Scarth looked upon these pages and website as if material intended for simpletons and illiterates in English, by arrogantly failing to address the fact that this website WAS & IS FOR THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE and *trust*, the last including persons of his mentality to every other citizen & taxpayer.
    5.   Access from here the images of the pages in the October issue of 'COUNSEL' for the interview given to David Wurtzell by the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve QC MP when he specifically spoke of his PRIORITIES and high on the list the issue of FRAUD which the police through contempt for the law ignopre and through their contempt for the blunt criminals activities the founder of human-rights, Andrew Yiannides recognised way back in 1972, NOTHING BUT PROMOTION & EXPANSION OF THE ARROGANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, many an alleged victim-0challenger fell in love with as we expose and point to in our pages
    6.   xxx
    7.   xxx
    8.   xxx

Link to:  Downing Street         .The CAMILA Project home-page  .   Stephen Lawrence - challenge   . Solicitor Admits Fraud   . LAW & theft of rights 
Link to:  Cowboy Lawyers       . The Breeding Grounds - case .   Asylum seekers to the land of.. . Misconduct in Public Office  . GREED & FRAUD 
Link to:  The Routine response  . Evidence exists    Corrupt Britain    . Scriven Affidavit  
Link to:  House of Lords Precedent case -1939-1940 Relative to SOLICITORS DUTY TO COURT & JUSTICE - Deliberations on CONSPIRACY, DECEPTION, etc.
Link to:  The National Scandal - institutionalised fraud and corruption     Member of Haringey Council wrote with impunity
To List of Web-sites Where FRAUD IS EXPOSED  To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites 

. Back to HomePage


The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster